a2800276 wrote:
> I agree it has no technical merit. It can't do better, but it avoid having
> to think about the type mismatch. The functionality provided by ByteOrder
> is fairly simple to begin with, I assume its whole purpose is to reduce
> cognitive load/avoid dumb mistakes. My assumption
I agree it has no technical merit. It can't do better, but it avoid having
to think about the type mismatch. The functionality provided by ByteOrder
is fairly simple to begin with, I assume its whole purpose is to reduce
cognitive load/avoid dumb mistakes. My assumption is that it's probably not
