On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 10:40:33 AM UTC+13 Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
I second Richard's suggestion. I used the same trick for
https://github.com/periph/d2xx. This git repository contains a minimalist
shim for the .a libraries and nothing else. It's designed to compile on any
platform.
I second Richard's suggestion. I used the same trick for
https://github.com/periph/d2xx. This git repository contains a minimalist
shim for the .a libraries and nothing else. It's designed to compile on any
platform. It falls back to a scaffolding if the corresponding .a library is
not present for
I believe the fixes have already been released. Go 1.21 was released in
August and there have been 5 point releases to 1.20 since your version
(1.20.5) was released. Have you tried updating your Go toolchain?
On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 4:21:11 PM UTC-4 Pat Farrell wrote:
> yes that is it.
>
yes that is it.
I see that there is a patch that will be in the next release.
Anyone know of a workaround until then?
thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
Hi Jan,
I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest looking at using Go's
`embed` feature?
https://blog.jetbrains.com/go/2021/06/09/how-to-use-go-embed-in-go-1-16/
I have not tried it with C libraries so there may be numerous reasons why
it may not work for your needs. For example, I do not
looks like
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76495283/go-list-command-prints-hint-i-dont-understand
On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 7:25:46 PM UTC+2 Pat Farrell wrote:
> On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 1:22:42 PM UTC-4 TheDiveO wrote:
>
> go mod tidy
>
>
> I've done that, and while it just execu
On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 1:22:42 PM UTC-4 TheDiveO wrote:
go mod tidy
I've done that, and while it just executes quietly, I don't see how that
addresses the
issue that 'go list' fails to show me modules that have been updated.
thanks
pat
--
You received this message because you are sub
go mod tidy
On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 7:20:13 PM UTC+2 Pat Farrell wrote:
> i'm running
> go version go1.20.5 linux/amd64
>
> when I attempt to run 'go list' to find any updated to dependant
> modules, it fails.
>
> go list -m -u all
> go: updates to go.sum needed, disabled by -mod=readonly
i'm running
go version go1.20.5 linux/amd64
when I attempt to run 'go list' to find any updated to dependant
modules, it fails.
go list -m -u all
go: updates to go.sum needed, disabled by -mod=readonly
I've checked, and my go.mod and go.sum files are 777
-rwxrwxrwx 1 pfarrell pfarrell 408 Oct
To be clear: The behavior of an `http.ResponseWriter` to implicitly use a
200 status code if no explicit WriteHeader call is made is documented:
https://pkg.go.dev/net/http#ResponseWriter.WriteHeader
I really think it is a bad (or at least strange) idea to claim to implement
`http.ResponseWriter` w
It seems to me that the fact that the functions accept and return types
from `net/http` (like `http.ResponseWriter` and `http.Handler`) and given
that it's nested below `net/http` should make it fairly obvious that it's
meant to be used with `net/http`. I also genuinely don't understand what
the in
I guess you switched things here. Shared libraries (.so) need to be
available at engine. Static libraries (.a) are bagged into the binary.
-Bruno
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023, 3:55 PM Jan wrote:
> Thanks Tamas, this is useful information.
>
> One of my libraries is using a `.a` library -- as opposed t
Axel, thanks for providing some context.
I suppose it is better for me to think of the httptest package as specific
to the http package - although this is not explicitly stated: "Package
httptest provides utilities for HTTP testing"
This seems misleading as is the case with this '200' default.
13 matches
Mail list logo
