Hi Than,
I see there is malloc.h present in that path.
But, cmake throws one more error even before the mmap issue:
*-- Performing Test SPLIT_STACK_FUNCTIONAL*
*-- Performing Test SPLIT_STACK_FUNCTIONAL - Failed*
*-- trying -fcf-protection=none workaround*
*-- Performing Test SPLIT_STACK_WORKAROU
Hi Gophers!
We were unhappy with the common unit test styles and we think we found a
style that has clear advantages. An in-depth comparison can be found here
https://symflower.com/en/company/blog/2022/better-table-driven-testing.
We also added support for maintaining such tests in our VS Code
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 1:25 AM Wojciech Muła wrote:
>
> Thanks! Didn't know that the assembler is able to do this. TBH, for me, it's
> not desired behaviour when an assembler program does something extra to a
> low-level code. I have already observed that Go asm strips a series of NOPs,
> whic
My apologies for taking so long to respond; a new job and cold weather have
taken up most of my time.
I have two versions of the application; one CLI and one web. The programs create
characters for games and fiction, and use data text files relative to the binary (
/data/* ) to get names. The
I don't think PCALIGN is supported for x86. The assembler can parse the
instruction, but the x86 assembler backend can't generate machine code for
it.
Wouldn't be hard to add, I think. There's already disabled experimental
code in there for aligning loops.
On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 1:25:3
Thanks for sharing this! Picking up on that configuration, I found this
piece of documentation about gopls [1]. I followed these steps:
- Check out github.com/golang/go to /Users/frm/src/go.
- Build the language distribution as described here [2].
- Create a new VSCode workspace at /User
Correction:
- it must be possible to express that T is comparable (so that you can use
map[K]V, were K must be comparable)
- it must be possible restrict T to a concrete list of types (f.e. min(a, b
T) T must be possible to write)
On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 11:13:01 AM UTC+1 Markus Heukelo
I think the consensus in the Go community is to refrain from comparing Go
language features with other programming languages. Rationale ~:
- it is highly contentious
- it is very difficult to answer, it's like asking "is purple more blue or
more red"
- no matter the answer, it will not help you
Thanks! Didn't know that the assembler is able to do this. TBH, for me,
it's not desired behaviour when an assembler program does something extra
to a low-level code. I have already observed that Go asm strips a series of
NOPs, which is highly unexpected.
A directive for alignment is way cleare
Oops, I see it's disabled; but the knob is there if you want to experiment.
On Friday, 25 February 2022 at 08:35:10 UTC Brian Candler wrote:
> It seems to me that there is automatic alignment for loops:
>
> https://github.com/golang/go/blob/go1.17.7/src/cmd/internal/obj/x86/asm6.go#L51-L67
>
>
>
It seems to me that there is automatic alignment for loops:
https://github.com/golang/go/blob/go1.17.7/src/cmd/internal/obj/x86/asm6.go#L51-L67
On Friday, 25 February 2022 at 06:42:23 UTC Wojciech Muła wrote:
> The directive is not documented on https://pkg.go.dev/cmd/internal/obj/x86.
> `grep
11 matches
Mail list logo
