I would be surprised if they have a legal claim to "Ora" as well, otherwise
the dental products "Orajell", and "OralB" are in trouble!!!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fro
I plan to finish FFI (the Call/Invoke method) and add dladdr(3) for the sake of
completeness, and then the usual README/LICENSE stuff.
Still not sure what to do about the C to Go callbacks. Though it seems doable
now (runtime.cgocallback).
--
You received this message because you are subscribe
A readme to make it discoverable would be nice as well.
On Saturday, 14 December 2019 04:17:24 UTC+11, Ivan Trubach wrote:
>
> Sure, I will. The dyld package should work for dlsym C calls, however I
> don’t think it’s possible to do callbacks with the functionality runtime
> exposes (i.e. I am t
Sure, I will. The dyld package should work for dlsym C calls, however I don’t
think it’s possible to do callbacks with the functionality runtime exposes
(i.e. I am talking about API that sys/windows package provides).
So, yeah, while there is no need for Darwin dlopen in x/sys/unix, we still nee
On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, at 10:27 PM, karthik3...@gmail.com wrote:
> Specifically, I couldn't find how to partially mock the `struct`. Most
> suggestions revolve around breaking such `struct`s but in this case, the
> `struct` is already at its bare minimum. It seems like a fair ask to not
> break th
Oracle Trademark rules https://www.oracle.com/legal/trademarks.html does
not allow "Oracle" or "Ora" in names not owned by Oracle.
The lawyers forbid "orcl", too. So I have to change the name.
Thanks for the great suggestions (
https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/e1th8v/name_against_lawyer
