You can use table driven test, see
https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/TableDrivenTests
On Tuesday, April 23, 2019 at 12:03:15 PM UTC+3, hui zhang wrote:
>
> how to test main function coverage with different args to enhance
> coverage rate
> how to cover the red part ? for you can set args once
Hello!
I didn't find a lot of literature on Gomobile, so I decided to write about
what Gomobile is and how it works.
Any feedback is welcome :)
https://blog.koundinya.xyz/series/gomobile/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To
Why? You have saved 5 characters for no practical gain. I think you would enjoy
Ada.
> On Apr 23, 2019, at 8:05 PM, lgod...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> It sure would be nice if Go syntax allowed programmers to replace
>
> if ( test) {
> ...do sonething
> } else {
> ..do something else
> }
>
> with
> ? (test) {
> //...do something
> }
> {
> //..do something else
> }
I believe the Go team considered this very carefully early on the
language's development and came to the decision to use "if test" for
"? (test)" and "} else {" for "}{" (without the implied newline). They
also threw in "} else i
It sure would be nice if Go syntax allowed programmers to replace
if ( test) {
...do sonething
} else {
..do something else
}
with
? (test) {
//...do something
}
{
//..do something else
}
The ? operator can be anything the Go language team considers appropriate
--
You received this message
Try this
https://blog.golang.org/ismmkeynote
> On Apr 23, 2019, at 5:46 PM, Wojciech S. Czarnecki wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
> lgod...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> all responses appreciated
>>
>
> https://blog.plan99.net/modern-garbage-collection-911ef4f8bd8e?gi=da46a757af
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
lgod...@gmail.com wrote:
> all responses appreciated
>
https://blog.plan99.net/modern-garbage-collection-911ef4f8bd8e?gi=da46a757afd3#.sue21l4x8
I hope this helps
--
Wojciech S. Czarnecki
<< ^oo^ >> OHIR-RIPE
--
You received this message because yo
> On Apr 23, 2019, at 12:52 PM, Darko Luketic wrote:
>
> But Twitter is a loose group of individuals, or does it have group
> functionality now? Everything is done via #channels last time I checked.
> I honestly very rarely use it, too small sized posts, it's very chaotic and
> stuff you've see
The result is equivalent but a micro-benchmark shows that pkg io is 3x
faster.
go version go1.12.2 windows/amd64
pkg: github.com/iWdGo/GoCompilerEfficiency/src/writestring
BenchmarkFmtWriteString-4 50 2002 ns/op
BenchmarkIoWriteString-4 200 635 n
$ git version
git version 2.20.1.windows.1
$ go version
go version go1.12.2 windows/amd64
$ git config -l | grep autocrlf
core.autocrlf=true
core.autocrlf=true
Same issue remains intermittent. It is reproducible using git checkout --
Discarding changes sets default back to CRLF.
I could not loca
But Twitter is a loose group of individuals, or does it have group
functionality now? Everything is done via #channels last time I checked.
I honestly very rarely use it, too small sized posts, it's very chaotic and
stuff you've seen just now is gone after a reload and can't be found again.
Also
Don't get me wrong, I strongly believe in storing user data safely, and
especially passwords, hence my original question. But as I mentioned, I'm
basically trying to protect a customers email address at this point. So if
the attack vector I'm defending against is someone having direct access t
On Apr 21, 2019, at 9:02 PM, icod.d...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I don't know about you but for me, even if there wasn't so much going on,
> Google+ and the Go+ community was a source of info.
>
> Reddit is reddit, this whatever it is, is what it is, mewe can't replace
> G+.
> Facebook just isn'
all responses appreciated
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google
I think MeWe could do the job in a functional sense - but there is no
reason for Go folks to go there in mass. I find that Reddit has most of the
same links to info that G+ did... so I'm ok with it. I have accounts on
both MeWe and Reddit already for other things... so yeah...
On Sunday, April
how to test main function coverage with different args to enhance
coverage rate
how to cover the red part ? for you can set args once a time
func Test_main(m *testing.T) {
main2()
}
go test -coverprofile coverage.cov -args xxx.conf go tool cover
-html=coverage.cov -o coverage.html
--
Yo
You can run main in a goroutine, sleep for some time (or stress test the
server) and then exit.
On Tuesday, April 23, 2019 at 11:25:49 AM UTC+3, hui zhang wrote:
>
> I have daemon process, I try to test its coverage
>
>
> func Test_main(m *testing.T) {
>main()
> }
>
> go test -coverprofile c
I have daemon process, I try to test its coverage
func Test_main(m *testing.T) {
main()
}
go test -coverprofile coverage.out -args xxx.conf
since it is a daemon, I have to kill it to stop it
kill or ctrl + c
I got the coverage report coverage.out only 10B
and of course , no
18 matches
Mail list logo
