Sorry, the last program is about server.and the following program is about
the client:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"net"
"os"
)
func main() {
var buf [512]byte
if len(os.Args) != 2 {
fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "usage:%s host:port", os.Args[0])
}
service := os.Args[1]
tcpAddr, err :
Hi,
with the lack of a official debugger, i am using delve.
It is very nice and get the work done mostly, needs little or a lot of
polishing.
Is there any plan to provide a official debugger which will be distributed
with the releases?
Maybe delve could make it as the official one?
Do not get
2017. november 6., hétfő 2:11:48 UTC+1 időpontban Chun Zhang a következőt
írta:
>
> Hi, All,
>
> I am trying to read a configuration file using Viper, the config file is a
> very simple json file with one line
> {
> "device" : "eth1"
> }
>
> I use the following line to read it
>
> device := vi
What if you use stem[:len(stem):len(stem)] as the stem?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more option
I think #1 would be clearer if it were written as
1) "We must return the slice afterwards because ... the our slice value (the
run-time data structure holding the pointer, length, and capacity) is a copy of
the callers.”
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Hi, All,
I am trying to read a configuration file using Viper, the config file is a
very simple json file with one line
{
"device" : "eth1"
}
I use the following line to read it
device := viper.GetString("device")
then passing this var further into a C library with swig generated api as
ar
With high N, I have been able to confirm raciness.
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 11:13 +1030, Dan Kortschak wrote:
> I have not been able to get the race detector to complain about this,
> even if I make len << cap.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-
Say I have a []T that I want to use as a common stem that has a tail
appended onto it, used concurrently, for example:
for i := 0; i < N; i++ {
tail := makeTail(i) // Returns a []T.
wg.Add(1)
go func() {
defer wg.Done()
a := append(stem, tail
You could also just the integers themselves as keys.
John
John Souvestre - New Orleans LA
From: golang-nuts@googlegroups.com [mailto:golang-nuts@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Chun Zhang
Sent: 2017 November 05, Sun 15:09
To: golang-nuts
Subject: [go-nuts] Converting uint to string
Hi, Jan,
Thank you very much!!
Best,
Chun
On Sunday, November 5, 2017 at 4:17:43 PM UTC-5, Jan Mercl wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 10:09 PM Chun Zhang > wrote:
>
> > I have a group of integers ranging from 1 to 2^32 that are in the format
> of uint32.
>
> Assuming you mean 'to 2^32-1'.
>
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 10:09 PM Chun Zhang wrote:
> I have a group of integers ranging from 1 to 2^32 that are in the format
of uint32.
Assuming you mean 'to 2^32-1'.
> However, I am wondering if I use string(i) only, will I get any two
numbers the same string representation? My guess is no, bu
Hi, All,
I have a group of integers ranging from 1 to 2^32 that are in the format of
uint32. I know strconv.Itoa(i) or strconv.FormatUint(i) can definitely give
unique representation of each number. So, I can use it as the index of a
map[string]interface{}.
However, I am wondering if I use st
David,
I think the plan is to gather experience with math/bits and then devise
something along the lines of a package that could do vectorized operations.
(Also avx1/2 should be in 1.10 so there's that.)
-s
sent from my droid
On Nov 5, 2017 5:20 PM, "David M." wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested
I consider foo.bar and f.b to be of the same length, as in length of a
list, 2 in this case, not length of a string. But I failed to be clear
about it.
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017, 17:38 Daniel Skinner wrote:
> > I don't know when the shallowest depth can occur while not being on
> shortest path
>
> I k
> I don't know when the shallowest depth can occur while not being on
shortest path
I know the feeling if we're generally talking about data structures and
algorithms, but with regards to language spec, the only mental reference I
have for "path" is for "import paths" of which the actual name is
i
Using some of the net/... package calls libc unless disabled.
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017, 17:13 Howard Guo wrote:
> Hello fellow gophers.
>
> I've a small number of go programs that only use standard library
> functions without any 3rd party library dependency. A strange behaviour was
> observed during
Hi,
I'm interested in high performance applications in Go, and I saw the new
"math/bits" package. I think it's very nice that the compiler replaces the
Go implementation with special CPU instructions when the architecture
supports it.
My question is, is there a plan to do something similar wit
Hello fellow gophers.
I've a small number of go programs that only use standard library functions
without any 3rd party library dependency. A strange behaviour was observed
during compilation (go build) - most of them compile into static
executable, but few of them end up linking to glibc. With
I don't know when the shallowest depth can occur while not being on
shortest path. Note that path was used in this discussion as meaning full,
unpromoted path, ie. like if every embedded field of type T was declared T
T instead. The actual selector expression is a prefix of this full path.
On Sun
The spec uses "shallowest depth", not "shortest path", as I assume saying
"path" would imply the given names in a selector expression determine
ambiguity when they do not.
"shallowest depth" makes the error more clear in my sample where if this:
type Uniform GLUniform
is changed to this:
type U
Both reasons correct: the underlying array, length and cap may change, and as
all arguments are pasded by value, we can't see the change if we don't use
(assign) the returned value.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe
>
> I don't follow. It had been shown, that the result of append is actually
> not needed/can be constructed by other means - except in the case where the
> backing array gets reallocated. Then you can't get away without it.
>
Hmmm, it feels like we're talking past each other. Of course you can ig
yes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
sure, in line 16.
So, don't continue means I can do this?
ch <- Result{500}
return
On Saturday, November 4, 2017 at 5:26:37 PM UTC-4, Tamás Gulácsi wrote:
>
> If err!=nil, response is nil, too - so don't continue!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:16 AM Ben Hoyt wrote:
> Hence the confusion. Sure, append can write to the underlying array
because that's effectively passed by reference. But it can't update the
length of the slice itself, unless you return it.
I don't follow. It had been shown, that the result of app
25 matches
Mail list logo
