On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:08:32 AM UTC+8, Dave Cheney wrote:
>
> The middle one, however you should make sum exported for the most reliable
> results.
Thanks. Yes I just remembered that the g in the last one will escape to
heap, maybe this is the reason why it is slow.
--
You receiv
1. Convert it to a number
2. Use `rune()`
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:51:09 AM UTC+12, Tong Sun wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Given a unicode code string, be it "4e16", or "0x4e16", or "u4e16", how to
> turn it into a single char rune?
>
> You can finish the code at https://play.golang.org/p/AFIEz3eJVz
Hey All,
I am trying to iterate over an array, match the lines in a file and then
delete all occurrences of the lines in the file.
See this example.
*Array*
var abcd = [5]string{
"one two",
"three four fix",
"six",
"seven eight nine ten",
"eleven twelve thirteen fourteen fif
Fedora does the same thing.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.googl
The middle one, however you should make sum exported for the most reliable
results.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@goog
Hi,
Given a unicode code string, be it "4e16", or "0x4e16", or "u4e16", how to
turn it into a single char rune?
You can finish the code at https://play.golang.org/p/AFIEz3eJVz
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsub
I did indeed try that. Same result as wiping everything from my GOPATH
(except the source I am immediately working on) and doing a normal "go get
...".
On Saturday, 22 April 2017 12:58:43 UTC-4, David Peacock wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Joshua Humphries > wrote:
>
>> I have some
hi!
yet another small cli utility you might find useful if you work cross
environments,
*cct* lets you run multiple commands concurrently, then wait for their
completion.
where the two interesting commands are
$ cct -add $bucket $cmd$ cct -wait [-verbose] [-keep] [-immediate] [-json]
$bucket
Ah!! Thanks a lot! (was planning to do next to get the correct output
first, but get confused as the go output)
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Ian Davis wrote:
> The link says "Example functions without output comments are compiled but
> not executed."
>
> You don't appear to have the necessar
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Joshua Humphries
wrote:
> I have some code for which "go get -t -v" is suddenly failing for Go 1.6,
> complaining about a reference to the "context" package (added in 1.7).
>
> I haven't changed any of my imports, so this means a dependency has been
> updated to s
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 12:20:52 AM UTC+8, Jan Mercl wrote:
>
> You need to define what do _you_ consider 'reliable' to get a useful
> answer.
>
calculate the sum of a number array elements.
>
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017, 17:26 T L > wrote:
>
>> I write a benchmark, but the results of the fo
You need to define what do _you_ consider 'reliable' to get a useful answer.
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017, 17:26 T L wrote:
> I write a benchmark, but the results of the following 3 cases are much
> different.
> Which one is reliable?
>
> package main
>
> import (
> "testing"
> "runtime"
> )
>
>
Yes, that was it! I reported upstream (Arch Linux) and it is now fixed.
Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegro
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
st ov wrote:
> Wow! Thanks everyone!
>
> So if I got this right, Go always makes a copy but whats actually
> being copied differs by type.
>
> It seems that I don't need to worry about a lot of data being copied
> about with the larger data structures,
I write a benchmark, but the results of the following 3 cases are much
different.
Which one is reliable?
package main
import (
"testing"
"runtime"
)
const N = 200 * 1000
type Element int64
var sum int
func Benchmark_MaybeOptimizedOut(b *testing.B) {
var a [N]Element
b.ResetTime
Anyone else getting this error?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.g
Hello, fellow Gophers!
I have some code for which "go get -t -v" is suddenly failing for Go 1.6,
complaining about a reference to the "context" package (added in 1.7).
I haven't changed any of my imports, so this means a dependency has been
updated to suddenly require Go 1.7. I'm trying to figu
I am not an Oracle guy but a sysadmin who had users that required the
ability to do database queries. My company has a user management system
that is fine for Linux where they go in to a web site in the company and
request access, and their access is based off of roles. Normally there is a
read
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 01:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
Frits van Bommel wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 9:10:16 AM UTC+2, hui zhang wrote:
> >
> > for 1) you mean
> >>
> >> char *CGetPath() {
> >> return getpath().c_str();
> >> }
> >
> >
> > this code will work ?
> >
>
> That depends on wheth
On Sat, 22 Apr 2017, at 02:51 AM, Tong Sun wrote:
> I'm afraid that you are wrong at both points.
>
> - tests needn't have to use the the *same *package name, in this case
> *package pybr *is good, but *package pybr_test *is good as well.> - func
> TestXxx is not the only signature allowed, se
The OP probably means connecting to Oracle from an "externally identified"
user.
Oracle can delegate the authentication to the OS providing the connection
is done from
a given OS user (already authenticated by the system).
Normally, with OCI, you can connect by passing empty strings for user an
21 matches
Mail list logo
