Thank you for giving incentives
On Monday, August 29, 2016 at 9:04:03 AM UTC+4:30, Mahmoodreza Aarabi wrote:
>
> Hello
> Thank you for your effort, it is so admirable, and it will help alot to
> people who likes to work in the state of the art of programming languages.
> keep going man.
> :)
>
>
Clarifying: I'm not asking a question. However, the explanation is a
good one. It could form the basis for a FAQ answer.
On Sun, 2016-08-28 at 22:40 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Dan Kortschak
> wrote:
> >
> > This would have been a significantly shorter threa
It seems to me that this comes up often enough that it satisfies the
definition of a FAQ. I know that
https://golang.org/doc/faq#convert_slice_of_interface is commonly
pointed to as an explanation, but it is not entirely satisfactory since
it is talking about the specific case of []T to []interface
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 3:36 AM, wrote:
>
> In fact T L's experience reminds me very much of probably my first
> experience with go .. I had read the specification completely, and I thought
> 'thoroughly' - then immediately tried this :
> https://play.golang.org/p/or1Ikhr4en
>
> package main
>
>
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Dan Kortschak
wrote:
>
> This would have been a significantly shorter thread if there had been a
> clear explanation of the motivation behind slice conversion restrictions
> early. This could have been after about the second (certainly by fourth)
> post from TL wh
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 8:26 PM, T L wrote:
>
> On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 11:00:53 AM UTC+8, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:41 AM, T L wrote:
>> >
>> > I don't think an int64 value can be converted to an int value is for
>> > they
>> > have the same underlying type.
Hello
Thank you for your effort, it is so admirable, and it will help alot to
people who likes to work in the state of the art of programming languages.
keep going man.
:)
On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 11:35:58 PM UTC+4:30, Cool Boy wrote:
>
> Hello gophers
> After 5 years experience working with
I'm relatively new to Go, coming from a Windows/.NET background primarily.
Does the Go runtime itself offer performance counters similar to what
Windows makes available via perfmon? Specifically, I'm looking to capture
realtime (not via a dump) metrics on heap usage, thread counts, GC
collectio
Klaus, thank you for your input and pointing us to RawSpeed. I glanced
through it and noticed one of the approaches you take is to create decoders
based on the "format" and use camera Make/Model tags to decide which
decoder to use. I am glad to say this is also the approach I was taking
and menti
Sample code:
https://play.golang.org/p/6PZH13zqKH
Which when run on your local machine, will error with:
2016/08/28 18:21:14 Get https://www.google.com: malformed HTTP response
"\x00\x00\x18\x04\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x03\x00\x00\x00d\x00\x04\x00\x10\x00\x00\x00\x05\x00\x00@
\x00\x00\x06\x00\x0
Hey, I've not been able to figure out how to enable HTTP/2 in a net/http
client that needs some tls.Config settings in its Transport (like it's
needs a specific root added at run time) using only the stdlib.
Is there a way to enable HTTP/2 on clients in the stdlib that I've missed?
(Related: I th
Hi
Thanks a lot
I accept and certify your talks
Posts located on Daneshjooyar.com published by the management, which I
thought very carefully written to attract iranian users
However, in my opinion, you and other Gophers may seem illogical, but for
most users will be attractive
In any case, post
Alright, gotk3 appears to be working properly now. I found the right
function - I had found set_surface_pixbuf in the GTK3 docs, but thought it
missing from the gotk3, until a helpful page pointed out that it was *not*
a Cairo function, and took the Cairo context as a parameter instead.
So, one
Hi Erfan,
This is cool! I skimmed through the videos. I think the videos are great
for students learning Go as their first language.
I read the intro page, and I think your reasons for "a bright future for
Go" are reasonable but somewhat subjective. I think it would be useful to
include why Go
I still have not tested on Windows; I did look up and find some
documentation on how to get go and gtk installed and working together on
Windows, and it basically boils down to installing the linux version of go
under mingw.
https://github.com/conformal/gotk3/wiki/Installing-on-Windows
http://s
Hello gophers
After 5 years experience working with Go, i decided to record educational
videos for iranian users which can't learn go simply
I'm an iranian and i know iranian users need to be trained
In the past years, i didn't see any significant training for Go in iran,
Actually nothing
Now i
On Sunday, 28 August 2016 17:33:10 UTC+2, Jan Mercl wrote:
>
> Using len(ch) like this in a concurrency scenario is a big no because then
> the value you get carries 0 bits of useful information. It's not a data
> race, it's worse, the race is semantic and not fixable without removing the
> use
Thanks for comments. The status00 should be not-buffered (status00 =
make(chan *Data)); was rate limiting on two channels.
On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 8:16:50 PM UTC+4:30, Henrik Johansson wrote:
>
> The race is between the len call and the use of the channel. Entries can
> have been added in
Here is a good news.
The crypto/des package has some low-hanging-fruit optimizations that are
worth trying.
The results of the benchmark have being improved to an extent (I tested it
on AMD64 though):
> Old
BenchmarkEncrypt-4 200 852 ns/op 9.38 MB/s
Benchmar
Interesting. Thanks for sharing.
I used to confront with a similar scenario in the C world, where we had to
use *sched_setscheduler(2) *to prevent the OS scheduler from interfering
with our application, which requires a below ~50ms variation IIRC. Yeah, it
happened even though the application w
The race is between the len call and the use of the channel. Entries can
have been added in between.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016, 17:40 dc0d wrote:
> Would you please elaborate on that?
>
> As I understand it there is no concurrent use of len happening here. It's
> a for loop and all calling to len is
TLDR; channels, like maps, are references to the a data structure stored
elsewhere. Calling Len on either returns the length of the data stored in the
underlying channel. This is different to a slice, which is a three word value,
containing it's own Len and cap values.
As Jan notes, Len(ch) is
Would you please elaborate on that?
As I understand it there is no concurrent use of len happening here. It's a
for loop and all calling to len is happening sequentially. Unless the
channels make the code inside cases of one select statement concurrent -
which will be super confusing for me.
O
Using len(ch) like this in a concurrency scenario is a big no because then
the value you get carries 0 bits of useful information. It's not a data
race, it's worse, the race is semantic and not fixable without removing the
use of len(ch).
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016, 17:26 dc0d wrote:
> TL;DR
>
> Does
TL;DR
Does assigning a (buffered) channel, already in a variable, to a second
variable, affects the result of len function?
Long version:
What is happening here? - Code at the end; Go 1.7.
*Output 1*:
Nine times:
[ info ] 2016/08/28 19:51:28 LEN_BEFORE=0
[
For what its worth, I was able to authenticate by using the cookie as the
username and password (username is the part before the "=" password is the
part after).
On Saturday, August 27, 2016 at 10:56:04 PM UTC-4, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:49 AM, >
> wrote:
> >
>
agree with Korshak above
In fact T L's experience reminds me very much of probably my first
experience with go .. I had read the specification completely, and I
thought 'thoroughly' - then immediately tried this
: https://play.golang.org/p/or1Ikhr4en
package main
import (
"fmt"
)
func main()
I think that your original interpretation of TL's questions is the
correct one, and the one that I read when I read all of this posts. I
don't think that it's a fair characterisation that he is asking about
possibility rather that design, even in the post that this was a reply
to.
I can understand
28 matches
Mail list logo
