Re: New version of Hugo, new dependencies

2024-12-30 Thread Mikel Olasagasti via golang
Hi Mike, Hau idatzi du W. Michael Petullo via golang (golang@lists.fedoraproject.org) erabiltzaileak (2024 abe. 29(a), ig. (21:17)): > > I have some review requests for Go packages that are required for Hugo > 0.140.1: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334845 Needs some changes. >

Heads-up: Go 1.24 causing widespread FTBFS in F42

2025-01-19 Thread Mikel Olasagasti via golang
Hi, This is a heads-up regarding the impact of Go 1.24, now available in Fedora, and the subsequent mass-rebuild for Fedora 42. Over 200 packages are currently failing to build from source (FTBFS) [1] due to a stricter check introduced in Go 1.24 [2]. The failure occurs due to a stricter vet chec

Intention to retire golang-github-siddontang-goredis and golang-github-ledisdb

2025-01-13 Thread Mikel Olasagasti via golang
Hi SIG, As proposed a few months ago[1], I would like to retire the `golang-github-siddontang-goredis` and `golang-github-ledisdb` packages. Package `golang-github-siddontang-goredis` has been FTBFS since F39 and has been dead upstream for 6 years. The only package depending on it is `golang-gith

Re: New version of Hugo, new dependencies

2025-05-14 Thread Mikel Olasagasti via golang
Hi Mike, FYI, members of Go-SIG plan to propose vendoring dependencies as the default method to package Golang packages. This is the draft of the document: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GolangPackagesVendoredByDefault Being Hugo a complex package it's safe to start using go-vendor-tools

Re: Hugo go-vendor-tools package

2025-06-03 Thread Mikel Olasagasti via golang
Hi Mike, Sorry for the late replies, I've been busier than expected last week. For that error I found that Brad already hit the same issue in https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/issues/8860#issuecomment-2558287657 and fixed by applying "%global __golang_extldflags -Wl,-z,undefs" after %build in https