[go-rpm-macros] PR #55: Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines

2023-09-24 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
eclipseo opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/55 _

[go-rpm-macros] PR #55: Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines

2023-09-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
decathorpe commented on the pull-request: `Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines` that you are following: `` Won't this break existing packages that use `%{goname}` for the name of the source package? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.i

[go-rpm-macros] PR #55: Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines

2023-09-24 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
eclipseo commented on the pull-request: `Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines` that you are following: `` Testing is in progress. The goal would be to recreate new repos and retire the older ones. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/g

[go-rpm-macros] PR #55: Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines

2023-09-24 Thread Maxwell G
gotmax23 commented on the pull-request: `Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines` that you are following: `` > Won't this break existing packages that use %{goname} for the name of the > source package? Yeah, I was about to write the same thing. We cannot change this without bre

[go-rpm-macros] PR #55: Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines

2023-09-24 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
eclipseo commented on the pull-request: `Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines` that you are following: `` Problem is: - I need to request new compat package on fedora-scm-requests - @tibbs won't approve package with -version anymore - thus if i want the package approved, i need

[go-rpm-macros] PR #55: Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines

2023-09-24 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
eclipseo commented on the pull-request: `Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines` that you are following: `` > We cannot change this without breaking many packages Package won't be broken because they will be superseeded by the replacement with Provides/Obsoletes. Packages will be

[go-rpm-macros] PR #55: Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines

2023-09-24 Thread Maxwell G
gotmax23 commented on the pull-request: `Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines` that you are following: `` > - @tibbs won't approve package with -version anymore That's not exactly how I interpreted that comment. I left https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/55886#c

[go-rpm-macros] PR #55: Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines

2023-09-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
decathorpe commented on the pull-request: `Fix goname generation to match versioning guildelines` that you are following: `` Is rather document the -N format for compat packages in the Packaging Guidelines than make hundreds of Go packages break `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply t

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Go SIG

2023-09-24 Thread jcajka
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Go SIG on 2023-09-25 from 20:00:00 to 21:00:00 Europe/Prague At fedora-gol...@libera.chat The meeting will be about: Fedora's Go SIG meeting More information available at: [https://pagure.io/GoSIG/go-sig/](https://pagure.io/GoSIG/go-sig/)