Re: SIG opinion request - golang-github-migrate package

2023-07-17 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 12:03 PM Link Dupont wrote: > > Hi go-sig, > > I have packaged up github.com/golang-migrate/migrate for Fedora. This > project makes extensive use of build tags to include or exclude various > databases and migration sources. Because of these build tags, I did not > use the

Re: SIG opinion request - golang-github-migrate package

2023-07-17 Thread Link Dupont
Quite large. That's part of what prompted my approach. And each of these backends has its own potential pile of additional dependencies. GOPATH=/home/link/go GO111MODULE=off golist --imported --package-path github.com/golang-migrate/migrate cloud.google.com/go/spanner cloud.google.com/go/spann

Re: SIG opinion request - golang-github-migrate package

2023-07-17 Thread Mikel Olasagasti
Hi Link, Hau idatzi du Link Dupont (l...@sub-pop.net) erabiltzaileak (2023 eka. 29(a), og. (18:03)): > > Hi go-sig, > > I have packaged up github.com/golang-migrate/migrate for Fedora. This > project makes extensive use of build tags to include or exclude various > databases and migration sources.

Re: SIG opinion request - golang-github-migrate package

2023-07-17 Thread Link Dupont
Wow. I don't know how I missed those existing packages. I think perhaps after I stopped using %go_generate_buildrequires, I assumed those packages didn't exist. I'd think I'd rather take an additive approach to the optional backends and sources. It feels more intuitive to add support for a bac