linkdupont commented on the pull-request: `Add BUILDTAGS to %gobuildflags` that
you are following:
``
> I'm actually confused why `%gobuildflags` exists, because `%gobuild` below
> that doesn't use it. In fact, `%gobuild` uses an exact copy of `gobuildflags`
> with `BUILDTAGS` _already_ there.
linkdupont commented on the pull-request: `Add BUILDTAGS to %gobuildflags` that
you are following:
``
> +1 to `GOBUILDTAGS`. The macros already make use of `GOBUILDFLAGS`, so this
> follows convention. It also avoids the (albeit narrow) situation where
> `BUILDTAGS` is already assumed to mean "