Re: Watch out when updating Hashicorp packages!

2023-08-13 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati
Btw, looking for hashicorp in pakcage names is not enough. An example is https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vagrant Best, Fale On Sat, Aug 12, 2023, at 18:45, Maxwell G wrote: > Hi everyone, > > On Fri Aug 11, 2023 at 16:16 +0200, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: >> I checked all specs that have hashicor

Re: Watch out when updating Hashicorp packages!

2023-08-12 Thread Maxwell G
Hi everyone, On Fri Aug 11, 2023 at 16:16 +0200, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: > I checked all specs that have hashicorp name on it and only > golang-github-hashicorp-consul.spec would be affected partially by the > change. > > As Hashicorp mentions in their blog "HashiCorp APIs, SDKs, and almost > all

Re: Watch out when updating Hashicorp packages!

2023-08-11 Thread Mikel Olasagasti
I checked all specs that have hashicorp name on it and only golang-github-hashicorp-consul.spec would be affected partially by the change. As Hashicorp mentions in their blog "HashiCorp APIs, SDKs, and almost all other libraries will remain MPL 2.0." and it seems the case for consul' API and SDK:

Re: Watch out when updating Hashicorp packages!

2023-08-11 Thread Alejandro Saez Morollon
Thanks for the notification. That's not good news :( I guess at that point we should deprecate them. Maybe other repositories like RPMFusion can take them. On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 7:07 AM Bob Mauchin wrote: > Hello, > > Hashicorp just moved all their products to a non-free license: > https://ww