* Maxwell G.:
> On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 5:37:21 AM CDT Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Hmm. I was wondering if you could use GOARCH=i386 to build i386
>> binaries from the x86-64 compose, but apparently not.
>
> It's GOARCH=386.
Ah, okay, and that works with the x86_64 packages, too.
Thanks,
Florian
* Maxwell G.:
> On Thursday, June 30, 2022 4:38:02 AM CDT Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Will the Go tools remain usable for building 32-bit programs? Can we
>> still reproduce 32-bit bugs on Fedora after this change?
>
> As I said, golang and the go libs/applications* aren't even shipped in
> composes
On Sat, Jul 2, 2022, 01:58 Maxwell G wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 29, 2022 4:10:14 PM CDT Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> > Could we too make a move toward this by dropping %ix86 from our supported
> > arches?
>
> I think it's worthwhile to remove our go libraries and applications. They
> are not in
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 11:10 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So the change deadline is very soon, so I'd like a quick answer on this.
>
> So Fedora is dropping i686 in the near future, only plsnning to support Wine
> related thingie
> as far as I know. Could we too make a move toward
* Robert-André Mauchin:
> So Fedora is dropping i686 in the near future, only plsnning to
> support Wine related thingie as far as I know.
I don't think this is actually true.
> Could we too make a move toward this by dropping %ix86 from our
> supported arches?
>
> Most Go dev don't bother to do
Hi,
So the change deadline is very soon, so I'd like a quick answer on this.
So Fedora is dropping i686 in the near future, only plsnning to support Wine related thingie
as far as I know. Could we too make a move toward this by dropping %ix86 from our supported
arches?
Most Go dev don't both
