[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2015-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 Daniel Walsh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2015-01-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 Daniel Walsh changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|dwa...@redhat.com |mh...@redhat.com -- You are receiving

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2015-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 Daniel Walsh changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jrie...@redhat.com |dwa...@redhat.com -- You are receivin

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2015-01-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 John Skeoch changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|mh...@redhat.com|jrie...@redhat.com -- You are receivin

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2014-07-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 --- Comment #11 from Matthew Heon --- Appears to be an issue with Golang proper (https://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=4391&q=signal&colspec=ID%20Status%20Stars%20Release%20Owner%20Repo%20Summary) Unknown when a fix will be released -

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2014-06-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 --- Comment #10 from Matthew Heon --- After further testing, I've managed to reproduce being unable to send signals 19, 18, and 27 to the container via --sig-proxy. This seems to be a Golang issue. I implemented a trivial signal-catching tes

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2014-06-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 --- Comment #8 from Matthew Heon --- PR out: https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/pull/6544 It appears that Signal 19 is actually forwarded, also. SIGSTOP cannot be caught, so it was actually preventing my script from printing out that it was r

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2014-06-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 Daniel Walsh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Daniel Wa

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2014-06-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Heon --- Signal 17, SIGCHILD, is deliberately not forwarded - upstream commit https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/commit/440422a96346072a0a9016c4db78ff7599a702aa. Signal 19 might actually be a Golang bug - I've cons

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2014-06-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Heon --- After further testing, I've determined that all signals are sent correctly except 17 and 19. I'm looking into a fix for this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2014-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 --- Comment #4 from Matthew Heon --- With upstream Docker, signal 27 works. Signal 17, however, is still broken. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ gola

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2014-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 Daniel Walsh changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|whe...@redhat.com |mh...@redhat.com -- You are receiving

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2014-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 Daniel Walsh changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|l...@redhat.com |whe...@redhat.com -- You are receivin

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2014-05-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 Daniel Walsh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dwa...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2014-05-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 Lukas Doktor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1096276 Referenced Bugs: https://bug

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2014-05-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 --- Comment #2 from Lukas Doktor --- The same bug is in upstream Docker version 0.10.0, build dc9c28f/0.10.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ golang m

[Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

2014-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 --- Comment #1 from Lukas Doktor --- The signal 17 is also ignored. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ golang mailing list golang@lists.fedoraproject.or