ngompa closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`go-rpm-macros` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Convert LDFLAGS to GOLDFLAGS and BUILTAGS to GOBUILDTAGS
``
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/41
--
___
golan
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `Add additional gobuildflags macros` that
you are following:
``
Does this supersede #41?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/62
--
___
golang m
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `Add additional gobuildflags macros` that
you are following:
``
You mean `$GO_LDFLAGS`?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/62
--
___
golang ma
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 4:14 PM Brad Smith wrote:
>
> At a minimum, I recommend that the patch include the original values
> for GOPROXY, GOSUMDB, and GOTOOLCHAIN as comments. This makes it
> easier to change back to default values. At the moment, one has to
> visit the relevant web pages.
>
> I l
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 12:03 PM Link Dupont wrote:
>
> Hi go-sig,
>
> I have packaged up github.com/golang-migrate/migrate for Fedora. This
> project makes extensive use of build tags to include or exclude various
> databases and migration sources. Because of these build tags, I did not
> use the
ngompa merged a pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
rpm/macros.d: use linkmode=external
``
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/43
___
golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedorapro
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `rpm/macros.d: use linkmode=external`
that you are following:
``
If there are no further objections, I'll merge this later today.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/43
__
ngompa added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
We _really_ need to do this now that `%set_build_flags` is going to get
executed automatically in package build environments in `%build`, `%install`,
and `%check` phases.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
h
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `rpm/macros.d: use linkmode=external`
that you are following:
``
:thumbsup:
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/43
___
golang mailing list --
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `rpm/macros.d: use linkmode=external`
that you are following:
``
This needs to be rebased, it can't be merged due to conflicts.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/43
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `[RFC] rpm/macros.d: use
linkmode=external` that you are following:
``
Sadly, I think this implementation is as simple as it gets. It was more complex
initially. :sweat_smile:
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 10:49 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> I've been talking with the awesome people at Sourcegraph, and they're
> interested in indexing our packages. Still working out what that'l look like
> exactly, but I'm pretty excited about it. (They're an open-source company
> with a SaaS
ngompa merged a pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
fix(macros): use gobuildflags macro in %gobuild
``
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/35
___
golang mailing list -- golang@lis
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `fix(macros): use gobuildflags macro in
%gobuild` that you are following:
``
:thumbsup:
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/35
___
golang mail
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `fix(macros): use gobuildflags macro in
%gobuild` that you are following:
``
Sure, Let's figure that out and make it happen soon though. Frankly, I want
these macros to make more sense...
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https:/
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `fix(macros): use gobuildflags macro in
%gobuild` that you are following:
``
Can you please change this to `GOBUILDTAGS`?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/35
__
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `Add BUILDTAGS to %gobuildflags` that you
are following:
``
:weary:
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/34
___
golang mailing list -- golang@l
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `Add BUILDTAGS to %gobuildflags` that you
are following:
``
> No -- this needs to match the go-rpm-macros used in c9s:
>
> https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/go-rpm-macros/-/blob/c9s/remove-fedora-dependency-automation.patch#L215
No, `c9s` needs t
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `Add BUILDTAGS to %gobuildflags` that you
are following:
``
Or rather, use `GO` prefix instead...
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/34
___
go
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `Add BUILDTAGS to %gobuildflags` that you
are following:
``
Please prefix it with a `GO_` namespace.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/34
___
ngompa closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`go-rpm-macros` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
macros: Accept options for %gotest
``
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/23
___
golang mailing list -- golang@
ngompa merged a pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Fix removal of `.git` suffix.
``
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/33
___
golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.o
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `Fix removal of `.git` suffix.` that you
are following:
``
:thumbsup:
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/33
___
golang mailing list -- golang
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 2:49 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a quick and dirty Python 3 script to track upstream package version
> including last GIT commit and commit date, so you can compare Hedora's version
> with upstream. This is slightly better than Anitya as it supports co
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `Remove tildes from goname` that you are
following:
``
They should not. If it's in the name field, it's like any other character, as
far as I know. @pmatilai, @ffesti, or @ignatenkobrain would know for sure,
though.
``
To reply, visit the link below or jus
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `Remove tildes from goname` that you are
following:
``
Also, are tildes really invalid in package names? I didn't think they were...
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/26
___
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `Remove tildes from goname` that you are
following:
``
This probably needs to be substituted with another character...
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/26
_
ngompa merged a pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Fix LDFLAGS macros typos
``
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/24
___
golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 2:47 AM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
> Le 2019-12-16 18:14, Neal Gompa a écrit :
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:06 PM Guillaume Rousse
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Le 14/12/2019 à 18:08, Neal Gompa (via dev Mailing List) a écrit :
> >&g
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:06 PM Guillaume Rousse wrote:
>
> Le 14/12/2019 à 18:08, Neal Gompa (via dev Mailing List) a écrit :
> > The go-rpm-macros package is supposed to supersede the old one.
> > Someone forgot to retire the go-srpm-macros and go-compilers packages
> >
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 11:44 AM Guillaume Rousse wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 13/12/2019 à 16:30, Thomas Backlund a écrit :
> >
> > Den 13-12-2019 kl. 16:22, skrev Thierry Vignaud (via dev Mailing List):
> >> Le ven. 13 déc. 2019 à 12:18, guillomovitch
> >> a écrit :
> >>> guillomovitch 3.0.8-1.mga8:
> >>
ngompa merged a pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
rpm/macros.d: Make disabling Go modules configurable for %gobuild and %gotest
``
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/22
___
gol
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `rpm/macros.d: Make disabling Go modules
configurable for %gobuild and %gotest` that you are following:
``
> (go commands will start downloading right and left, go packahe naming
> resolution will fail because modules have special rules for versions in the
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `rpm/macros.d: Make disabling Go modules
configurable for %gobuild and %gotest` that you are following:
``
> @ngompa: please stay coherent with the exising macros and do not use __
> prefixing
I dropped the prefix.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `rpm/macros.d: Make disabling Go modules
configurable` that you are following:
``
I know we have this flag set elsewhere in our macros, but I'm not sure how to
make that a control everywhere. Moreover, I really only need it for `%gobuild`
and `%gotest`...
`
ngompa opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you
are following:
``
rpm/macros.d: Make disabling Go modules configurable
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/22
ngompa merged a pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Expose Go build flags directly to spec files as a macro
``
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/21
___
golang mailing list -- go
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:32 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:53 PM Nicolas Mailhot
> wrote:
> >
> > Le mardi 21 mai 2019 à 10:43 +0200, Brian (bex) Exelbierd a écrit :
> > > BUILDDATE=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
> >
> > Please don't do that, that breaks build reproducibility.
ngompa added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
How do we handle the case of when patches should be applied
manually/conditionally?
Is it demonstratively worse to have either
```
%gosetup
%goautopatch
%goprep
```
or
```
%goautosetup
%goprep
```
instead?
``
To reply, visit the
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 7:51 AM Jakub Cajka wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for your interest.
>
> I will now create SIG wiki page(and let you know to add yourself there),
> IRC channel(#fedora-golang, making it official). I believe we can use
> golang@lists.fedoraproject.org as the mailing li
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:11 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now the technical PR is submitted
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/go-srpm-macros/pull-request/1
>
> and waiting for action from the go-srpm-macros maintainers, I took (quite a
> long) time to refresh and flesh out the corresponding packagin
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:40 AM, wrote:
>
>> - Mail original -
>> De: "Neal Gompa"
>
>>> I'm curious, what are you missing in the preamble ? As far as I can see
>>> it's all there (even though some values
>>> set to va
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:54 AM, wrote:
>
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Neal Gompa"
>
>>> 2. if your concern is that the *forge* macros are defective somewhere I'd
>>> be curious where as you'd be the
>>> first to rep
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:00 AM, wrote:
>
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Neal Gompa"
>
>> As long as I can do Obsoletes/Provides for the old name for the devel,
>> unit-test,
>
> BTW is anyone using the unit-test packages? Right now I do not gene
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
>> I really do like this. There are only two issues I have with it:
>>
>> 1. This seems to mandate that all packages must be named by their
>> import path. My golang package (snapd) is not, intentionally so. I
>> don't want to change this.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 5:45 AM, wrote:
>
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Neal Gompa"
>
>>On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune
>>
>>>> I really do like this. There are only two issues I have with it:
>>>>
>>&
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:57 AM, wrote:
>>De: "Panu Matilainen"
>
> Hi Panu,
>
>>> But don't override %setup. There's no need for such abuse
>
>> It is really pretty safe, the macro controls the downloaded file, the file
>> structure is known, the only time it won't "just
>> work" is when a spec
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 2:11 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am proposing for inclusion a set of rpm technical files aimed at automating
> the packaging of forge-hosted projects.
>
> - Packaging draft: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/More_Go_packaging
> - https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/734
>
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 3:33 AM, wrote:
>
> Since I'm a nice person I added GitLab support this morning (both gitlab.com
> and hosted gitlab). Releases are clearly an afterthought in GitLab, they
> depend on free-form tags and can't be used in rpm without knowing the
> corresponding hash (so wo
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:20 AM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> s/unless/without/
>
> And then it looks good.
>
Sorry, you're right. :)
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 3:26 AM Jakub Cajka wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Igor Gnatenko"
> > To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora"
> >
> > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Jakub Cajka"
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 6:40:27 PM
>
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 8:10 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> On Monday, 1 April 2019 09:40:09 CEST Jakub Cajka wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >
> > > From: "Robert-André Mauchin"
> > > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 6:29:30 PM
> > > Subject: go2
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 7:22 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm attempting to package up a Go-based application and I'm lost :)
>
> I've run "yum install gofed" so I've got gofed-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29
> installed. Here's where I tried to use it:
>
> $ gofed repo2spec --detect https://github.
Hello all,
For the Fedorans among you (and Richard), you may be aware that a
number of us met at Flock[0] and decided we wanted to do something
about the poor state of affairs on supporting Go in Linux
distributions. After the success we've had with Rust by collaborating
with different distributio
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:04 AM Jakub Cajka wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Jakub Cajka"
> > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 12:43:09 PM
> > Subject: Go SIG meeting
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > let's try figure out best slot for it.
> > https://fr
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:06 AM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
>
> However, my initial objectives were to produce clean prometheus and
> grafana Fedora packages, I finished the Go part a few months ago, but
> they both include a javascript layer, so I'll probably have to spend
> part of my packaging tim
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 11:27 AM Athos Ribeiro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:18:29AM -0400, Zachary Snyder wrote:
> > I will be interested in joining the sig! Frequent GO user and Fedora is my
> > daily driver. I will not be at flock but I will see everyone on IRC!
>
I'm interested in join
57 matches
Mail list logo
