Re: Golang 1.16

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: "Jakub Cajka" > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 7:49:40 AM > Subject: Re: Golang 1.16 > > On 12/22/20 2:52 PM, Jakub Cajka wrote: >

Re: Golang 1.16

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: "Jakub Čajka" > Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2020 3:53:12 AM > Subject: Golang 1.16 > > Hello Jakub, > > I wanted to ask you at the meeting, how is the update to Golang 1.16 > shaping up? H

Re-evalueting Go-SIG meeting slot/cadance

Hello, we have been talking about the fitness of current meeting slot in the recent past, especially in context of DTS shifts. I would like to start new poll to see if current slot, TZ peg and cadence is still working for us. Please fill this survey with your availability through out the wee

Go SIG meeting 4.2.2020(tomorrow)

Hello, sorry for short notice. I will not be able to chair tomorrow Go sig meeting as I will be traveling. Neal, Nicolas could please chair it? Thank you, JC ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide (koji) today

rawhide (koji) today > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 04:39:07AM -0400, Jakub Cajka wrote: > > > F31 change page: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Adopt_new_Go_Packaging_Guidelines > > > and approval: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2120 > > > > I

Re: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide (koji) today

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: "Jakub Cajka" > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to > Fedora" > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 11:23:34 AM > Subject: Re: New Go Packaging Guidel

Re: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide (koji) today

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot via devel" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: de...@lists.fedoraproject.org, annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Nicolas > Mailhot" > Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2019 3:45:20 PM > Subject: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide

Re: [golang-dev] Try our new module mirror!

- Original Message - > From: "Katie Hockman" > To: golang-...@googlegroups.com > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 10:35:38 PM > Subject: [golang-dev] Try our new module mirror! > > Hey Gophers! > > In the blog post Go Modules in 2019 , > we announced

Golang SIG meeting's new slot

Hello, based on the poll https://framadate.org/QX6R7hxJ2mM6HO8m we have decided on this week meeting to move SIG's meeting to new slot on Tue 1600h UTC with first meeting held being next week and then with bi-week cadence. Looking forward to see you all next week, JC

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Translating Go modules buildrequires in rpm syntax

- Original Message - > From: "Igor Gnatenko" > To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" > > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Jakub Cajka" > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 6:40:27 PM > Subject: R

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Translating Go modules buildrequires in rpm syntax

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" > > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Jakub Cajka" > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 1:27:09 PM > Subject: R

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Translating Go modules buildrequires in rpm syntax

lating Go modules buildrequires in rpm > syntax > > Le 2019-04-02 10:04, Jakub Cajka a écrit : > Hi Jakub, > > > But do we really need to recreate everything that upstream put in to > > the constrains in specs? I think that we are carrying curated set of > > the pack

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Translating Go modules buildrequires in rpm syntax

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 8:33:39 PM > Subject: [Fedora-packaging] Translating Go modules buildrequires in rpm syntax > > Hi, > > For Go modules, that will become the default upstream in Augus

Re: go2rpm

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 6:29:30 PM > Subject: go2rpm > > Hello, > > I have written go2rpm, based off rust2rpm, to convert Go packages to RPM. > It is available here: https://pagure.io/GoSI

New time slot for the Go SIG meeting

Hello, we agreed to find better time slot for our meeting on our last meeting as is seems that the current slot is no good anymore. I have created new poll to find better one. https://framadate.org/QX6R7hxJ2mM6HO8m Time is in the UTC and don't pay attention to the day dates as this is just to

Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: de...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: "nicolas mailhot" , > golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, jca...@redhat.com, "Discussion > of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 7:46:23 PM > Sub

Fwd: [security] Vulnerability in golang.org/x/crypto/salsa20

FYI it seems there has been discovered security vulnerability in the golang-googlecode-go-crypto package. Hopefully we will have tracking BZ shortly. JC - Forwarded Message - From: "Filippo Valsorda" To: golang-n...@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 11:53:53 PM Subject:

Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 8:58:39 PM > Subject: Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future > > L

Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2019 3:36:47 PM > Subject: Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future > > On dimanche 17 mars 2019 09:29:28 CET Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le dimanche 17 mars 20

Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2019 3:36:47 PM > Subject: Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future > > On dimanche 17 mars 2019 09:29:28 CET Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le dimanche 17 mars 20

Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go notary

- Original Message - > From: "Florian Weimer" > To: "Jakub Cajka" > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 1:17:16 PM > Subject: Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go > notary >

Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go notary

- Original Message - > From: "Florian Weimer" > To: "Jakub Cajka" > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 12:56:57 PM > Subject: Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go > notary >

Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go notary

- Original Message - > From: "Florian Weimer" > To: "Jakub Cajka" > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 11:44:09 AM > Subject: Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go > notary >

Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go notary

- Original Message - > From: "Florian Weimer" > To: "Jakub Cajka" > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 10:58:16 AM > Subject: Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go > notary >

Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go notary

- Original Message - > From: "Fabio Valentini" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 10:07:35 AM > Subject: Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go > notary > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019, 09:14 Nicolas Mailhot < nicolas.mail...@

Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go notary

- Original Message - > From: "Ian Denhardt" > To: "Matthew Dempsky" , "Nicolas Mailhot" > > Cc: "Russ Cox" , "'Matthew Dempsky' via golang-dev" > , > golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 7:18:49 PM > Subject: Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authenti

Go modules in Fedora

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Sam Whited" > Cc: "rprichard via golang-dev" > Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 11:06:44 AM > Subject: Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go > notary > > Hi Jakub, > > Th

Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go notary

- Original Message - > From: "Russ Cox" > To: "Jakub Cajka" > Cc: "Sam Whited" , "rprichard via golang-dev" > , > golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 9:02:50 PM > Subject: Re: [golang-dev]

Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go notary

- Original Message - > From: "Sam Whited" > To: "rprichard via golang-dev" > Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 7:06:37 PM > Subject: Re: [golang-dev] proposal: public module authentication with the Go > notary > > TL;DR — Right now when fetching a module Google isn't involved, and I'd > l

Re: go 1.12 final for f30+?

- Original Message - > From: "Fabio Valentini" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 4:34:54 PM > Subject: go 1.12 final for f30+? > > Hi golang list, > > Are there plans to update the golang package in fedora 30 and 31 to > the final 1.12 release soon-i

Re: go 1.12 final for f30+?

- Original Message - > From: "Jakub Cajka" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 8:18:57 PM > Subject: Re: go 1.12 final for f30+? > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Fabio

Re: go 1.12 final for f30+?

- Original Message - > From: "Fabio Valentini" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 4:34:54 PM > Subject: go 1.12 final for f30+? > > Hi golang list, > > Are there plans to update the golang package in fedora 30 and 31 to > the final 1.12 release so

Skipping the 26th Dec Go -SIG meeting

Hello, I propose to skip the next meeting as I will be unavailable to chair that meeting. 26th is a public holiday in CZ and I will be 100% offline on that day. JC ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an ema

Re: Golang back in EPEL 7

- Original Message - > From: "Fabio Valentini" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 4:35:38 PM > Subject: Re: Golang back in EPEL 7 > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 2:32 PM Jakub Cajka wrote: > > > > Hello, > &

Golang back in EPEL 7

Hello, as golang got deprecated in favor of Go-toolset[1] with release of RHEL 7.6[2] and as there has been interested[3]. I have unretired and reintroduced the golang package back in to the EPEL7. For time being I will keep updates on the same cadence as for EPEL6, i.e. keeping one version o

Go-SIG meeting reminder

Hello, sending late reminder for today's Go-SIG IRC meeting held on #fedora-golang at 1600h UTC. For agenda see https://pagure.io/GoSIG/go-sig/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting tagged issues. Sorry for sending late notice as I have misconfigured the Fedocal entry... it should be fixed n

Golang rebase to 1.11.1 in epel6

Hello, I have rebased golang from 1.9.7 to the 1.11.1 in epel6 as go1.9 is no longer supported in upstream. Bodhi update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-1.11.1-1.el6 I have observed one test failing due to broken pipes(on x86_64), but it doesn't look too serious to me, so I too

Re: Introducing the Fedora Go SIG and a proposal to build better Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "Neal Gompa" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, opensuse...@opensuse.org > Cc: "Aleksa Sarai" , "Richard Brown" > , vrothb...@suse.com, jca...@redhat.com > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 1:35:36 PM > Subject: Introducing the Fedora Go SIG and a propo

Re: Go SIG meeting

Hello, I have put the meeting in to the SIGs calendar https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/SIGs/. Location: fedora-golang@FreeNode Start: Wed, September 12, 2018 - 16:00 UTC End: Wed, September 12, 2018 - 17:00 UTC Initial meeting of Go SIG. Agenda: Introduction Pagure

Re: Go SIG meeting

> , "nicolas mailhot" , "nicolas > mailhot" > , "nicolas mailhot" > , "Jakub Cajka" > Sent: Monday, September 3, 2018 1:49:39 PM > Subject: Re: Go SIG meeting > > Le 2018-09-03 11:04, Jakub Cajka a écrit : > > Hi, > >

Re: Go SIG meeting

- Original Message - > From: "Jakub Cajka" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 12:43:09 PM > Subject: Go SIG meeting > > Hello, > > let's try figure out best slot for it. https://framadate.org/DrEWMnFlw1e8Pd8J >

Re: Golang SIG primary goals?

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: de...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 10:37:06 AM > Subject: Re: Golang SIG primary goals? > > Hi, > > Just to get people thinking before the meet… > > IMHO, the core o

Re: Golang SIG primary goals?

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, de...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 4:42:03 PM > Subject: Golang SIG primary goals? > > Hey guys and gals, > > Can we start to discuss this SIG goals? What each of you

Go SIG meeting

Hello, let's try figure out best slot for it. https://framadate.org/DrEWMnFlw1e8Pd8J please fill in this survey so we can get best possible time for the most. Looking forward to meet with you to discuss the issues and future plans. JC ___ golang maili

Re: Golang SIG for Fedora

- Original Message - > From: "Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, August 6, 2018 3:47:44 PM > Subject: Re: Golang SIG for Fedora > > I think we already have tools for that. What I expect with the SIG is > something that co

Re: Golang SIG for Fedora

- Original Message - > From: "Jakub Cajka" > To: "nicolas mailhot" , "zebob m" > , "ricardo martinelli oliveira" > , "Jan Chaloupka" > , "Derek Parker" > , "Paul Gier" > Cc: golang@lists.

Re: Golang SIG for Fedora

Thank you very much for your interest. I will now create SIG wiki page(and let you know to add yourself there), IRC channel(#fedora-golang, making it official). I believe we can use golang@lists.fedoraproject.org as the mailing list. And as it has been suggested to the container SIG I will

Golang SIG for Fedora

Hello, it seems that lately there has been more people maintaining Go package in the Fedora. I would like to propose to join up and form Go SIG so we could better co-ordinate and collaborate on the packaging issues and general developer experience. There are few big outstanding issues that

Fwd: [golang-dev] go modules have landed

It seems that Go upstream is making great progress on the vgo and Go modules. It looks like it might help us with better tracking the versioned dependencies(there will be some data in the repositories) and could force upstream to more properly declare their dependencies and actually making them

Re: Mass rebuild, mass Golang packages failures

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: de...@lists.fedoraproject.org, jca...@redhat.com > Cc: jchal...@redhat.com > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 2:34:49 PM > Subject: Mass rebuild, mass Golang packages failures > > Hello, > > > Since the mass rebuild and maybe because

Re: In the OpenShift Origin/CRI-O/Kubernetes effort we have a dilemma.

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: dwa...@redhat.com, mpa...@redhat.com, run...@redhat.com > Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2018 12:46:28 PM > Subject: Re: In the OpenShift Origin/CRI-O/Kubernetes effort we have a > dil

Go dynamic linking

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 4:45:31 PM > Subject: Re: vendored dep licenses to include (or skip) in binary rpms > > Le lundi 05 mars 2018 à 10:07 -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar a écrit : > > When you ship a

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

, 2018 7:34:03 PM > Subject: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging > > > > - Mail original - > De: "Jakub Cajka" > > Hi Jakub, > > >> And I'm sure any > >> attempt to strip the WIP bits from my side will be m

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

February 5, 2018 3:27:01 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging > guideline: More Go packaging > > > > - Mail original - > De: "Jakub Cajka" > > > Our as Fedora or yours company/org? I believe that your contribution of &g

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

, 2018 4:48:31 PM > Subject: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging > > > > - Mail original - > De: "Jakub Cajka" > > Hi Jakub > > > I think that it would be best if Nicolas could fold his proposal in to the > > original

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

018 12:16:14 PM > Subject: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging > guideline: More Go packaging > > > > - Mail original - > De: "Jakub Cajka" > > > I think one of the main responsibilities of Fedora packager is to work with

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: de...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Discussion of RPM packaging standards > and practices for Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 4:54:10 PM > Subject: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guid

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

ruary 3, 2018 4:27:36 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging > guideline: More Go packaging > > > De: "Jakub Cajka" > > Hi Jakub > > > I'm strongly against general unrestricted practice of compat packages as > > proposed.

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

ruary 1, 2018 4:24:52 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging > guideline: More Go packaging > > > De: "Jakub Cajka" > > >> Filling upstream holes is pretty much the definition of an > >> integrator/distributor role. In G

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

ruary 1, 2018 2:51:13 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging > guideline: More Go packaging > > > De: "Jakub Cajka" > > Hi Jakub, > > > It depends (as everything) on available manpower, if you are willing to own > > your depende

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , "Discussion of RPM packaging > standards and practices for Fedora" > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 11:21:59 AM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packagin

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "Owen Taylor" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Discussion of RPM packaging standards > and practices for Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 6:50:21 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "Jason L Tibbitts III" > To: "nicolas mailhot" > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to > Fedora" , > "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 6:00:24 PM > Subj

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: "Jason L Tibbitts III" > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to > Fedora" , > "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 9:28:15 PM > Subj

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "Marcin Dulak" > To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" > > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to > Fedora" > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 4:04:19 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re:

Re: Go 1.10 and PPC64LE builds

- Original Message - > From: "Jakub Cajka" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 1:52:44 PM > Subject: Re: Go 1.10 and PPC64LE builds > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jakub Cajk

Re: Go 1.10 and PPC64LE builds

- Original Message - > From: "Jakub Cajka" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 9:34:17 AM > Subject: Re: Go 1.10 and PPC64LE builds > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: e...@logic.net &

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Golang 1.10a

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 11:16:44 AM > Subject: Re: F28 System Wide Change: Golang 1.10a > > > > - Mail original - > De: "Jakub Cajka"

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Golang 1.10a

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 6:16:07 PM > Subject: Re: F28 System Wide Change: Golang 1.10a > > > > - Mail original - > De: "Jakub Cajka"

Re: Go 1.10 and PPC64LE builds

- Original Message - > From: e...@logic.net > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 9:05:10 PM > Subject: Go 1.10 and PPC64LE builds > > So like a lot of folks, I got an FTBFS when Go 1.10 landed in rawhide. After > fixing things (some net/url changes bit

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Golang 1.10a

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 3:47:00 PM > Subject: Re: F28 System Wide Change: Golang 1.10a > > > >De: "Jakub Cajka" > >> From: "nicola

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Golang 1.10a

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 2:48:36 PM > Subject: Re: F28 System Wide Change: Golang 1.10a > > De: "Jakub Cajka" > > > Have you investigated the b

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Golang 1.10a

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: "Jakub Cajka" > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to > Fedora" > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 2:22:26 PM > Subject: Re: F28 System Wide C

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Golang 1.10a

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Jakub Cajka" , > "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 4:32:22 PM > Subject: Re: F28 System Wide Change: G

Fwd: [golang-dev] [security] Go 1.8.4 and Go 1.9.1 are released

For record these vulnerabilities got assigned CVE-2017-15041 and CVE-2017-15042. Any packages using the affected component "net/smtp" needs to be rebuild with the fixed version of Go, in order to pick up the fix. Updates has been submitted in to Fedora 26,27,Rawhide(they are not in build root-ov

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Golang 1.8

- Original Message - > From: jfi...@fedoraproject.org > To: jca...@redhat.com > Cc: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related > to Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 6:17:23 AM > Subject: Re: F26 System Wide Change: Golang 1.8 > > > Jakub, >

p224 is back in Fedora

Hello, I will keep it short, we have resolution for the BZ#1379484/1038683 as subject suggest p224 is permissible in Fedora now. As of now I have dropped the patch removing it from Fedora's golang. All active Fedora releases, f25 and rawhide(epel6 tbd) now have the golang with p224 re-enabl

Golang 1.7 in Fedora 25

Hello, Fedora 25 will be shipping with golang 1.7.1. If you have been closely tracking the change proposal https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.7 you know :). By now go1.7 is in Fedora 25(and rawhide) for over one month. To see extensive list of most important changes see upstream doc

Fwd: [security] Go 1.6.3 and 1.7rc2 are released

Hello, on Monday there was point release and new rc release for golang fixing CVE-2016-5386(https://httpoxy.org/) affecting CGI use cases. I have briefly checked all packages depending on golang in Fedora and I have observed no such a use. If you have any package(s) that uses(is used with) CGI

Re: feedback requested: [security] Go 1.5.4 and Go 1.6.1

:). Please proceed to rebuild your packages(on all active Fedora branches, i.e. rawhide,f24,f23,f22). From upstream CVE summary: "...Programs using HTTPS client certificates or the Go SSH server libraries are both exposed to this vulnerability..." - Original Message - >

Golang for s390x

Hello, upstream just merged the s390x port in to the master branch of golang. As I'm doing builds of the golang master branch in to my repository in COPR[1] I have made changes to the package specfile that make it build-able on s390x. Unfortunately COPR doesn't have s390x builders. So you need t

Fwd: feedback requested: [security] Go 1.5.4 and Go 1.6.1

I'm planning on landing it in Fedora(all branches) ASAP as they go out. Please prepare to do rebuild of all your packages that might be affected by the CVEs in golang stdlib. Jakub - Forwarded Message - > From: "Andrew Gerrand" > To: "golang-nuts" > Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 2:22:0

Fwd: [security] Go 1.5.3 is released

Golang-1.5.3 build have been submitted to bodhi and to build-root override. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2dcc094217 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5a073cbd93 Please test and provide karma, also please consider rebuilding your packages, if they use TLS/RS

Fwd: F24 System Wide Change: Golang 1.6

- Forwarded Message - From: "Jan Kurik" To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to Fedora" Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 6:39:44 PM Subject: F24 System Wide Change: Golang 1.6 = Proposed System Wide Change: Golang 1.6 = https://fedoraproject.org/wik