- Mail original -
De: "Jakub Cajka"
Hi Jakub
> I think that it would be best if Nicolas could fold his proposal in to the
> original draft as
> optional part for simple library/binary packages.
Frankly, that's a lot of work and churn, I don't want the new parts to be
refused because
- Mail original -
De: "Jakub Cajka"
> Our as Fedora or yours company/org? I believe that your contribution of those
> in to Fedora will be much
> appreciated.
Our was meaning the set of specs we are preparing for inclusion. Can't really
share them before the macros they depend on are
- Original Message -
> From: "nicolas mailhot"
> To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Discussion of RPM packaging
> standards and practices for Fedora"
> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 12:16:14 PM
> Subject: [Fedora-packaging] Re:
- Mail original -
De: "Jakub Cajka"
> I think one of the main responsibilities of Fedora packager is to work with
> upstreams, help them
> mature and generally improve their projects.
Sure but expecting everything to be perfect and consistent before shipping
anything just DOES NOT WO
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert-André Mauchin"
> To: de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Discussion of RPM packaging standards
> and practices for Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 4:54:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guid
- Original Message -
> From: "nicolas mailhot"
> To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Discussion of RPM packaging
> standards and practices for Fedora"
> Sent: Saturday, February 3, 2018 4:27:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging
