https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022983
--- Comment #10 from Matthew Miller ---
(In reply to Adam Miller from comment #7)
> For reference, this is the issue I'm seeing building in mock:
>
> --- FAIL: TestCgoTraceback (0.83 seconds)
> crash_cgo_test.go:33: expected "OK\n", b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022983
--- Comment #9 from Adam Miller ---
Also, because I'm bad at making a complete thought before commenting on this
particular BZ here is the SRPM I have that fails that test in mock for both F20
and Rawhide
http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022983
--- Comment #8 from Matthew Miller ---
(In reply to Adam Miller from comment #6)
> I was building in mock which shouldn't have had any other version of Go
> installed in the chroot.
Aw, too bad, because that's an easy fix. (It should probably
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022983
--- Comment #7 from Adam Miller ---
For reference, this is the issue I'm seeing building in mock:
--- FAIL: TestCgoTraceback (0.83 seconds)
crash_cgo_test.go:33: expected "OK\n", but got "#
command-line-arguments\n/tmp/go-build5636714
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022983
--- Comment #6 from Adam Miller ---
I was building in mock which shouldn't have had any other version of Go
installed in the chroot.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022983
--- Comment #5 from Matthew Miller ---
(In reply to Adam Miller from comment #4)
> Go 1.2 builds on F20 but appears to fail one of the tests ... I'm going to
> look into it more as I find time but didn't want to remain silent on the BZ.
In th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022983
--- Comment #4 from Adam Miller ---
Go 1.2 builds on F20 but appears to fail one of the tests ... I'm going to look
into it more as I find time but didn't want to remain silent on the BZ.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022983
--- Comment #3 from Matthew Miller ---
Although I see that as I was writing this, the beta slipped by a week, pushing
everything back. If it slips by _another_ week and Go stays on schedule (and
from their docs it looks like they have a hard c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022983
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Miller ---
(In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #1)
> Love the idea! Actually I'd rather update golang in F20 as well not just in
> F21/Rawhide.
I think that's a little risky with the F20 schedule, where our re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022983
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://tip.golang.org/doc/g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022983
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov ---
Love the idea! Actually I'd rather update golang in F20 as well not just in
F21/Rawhide.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bu
2013/10/24 :
...
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
> Unsubscribe from this bug
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fCGXa3vB9j&a=cc_unsubscribe
^^^ This will be fixed soon by the Bugzilla administrator.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022983
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|golang@lists.fedoraproject. |
|org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022983
Bug ID: 1022983
Summary: Consider updating Rawhide to Go 1.2 release candidate
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: golang
Assignee: a...@spicenitz.org
Reporter: mat
14 matches
Mail list logo
