Hello,
I see that there are three versions of GnuPG available. Assuming
no hardware constraints, is there any reason to choose Classic 1.4
or Stable 2.0 instead of Modern 2.1? It appears to do everything
the others can and more.
Whitey
___
Gnupg
f similar to
> Camellia or Brainpool - I don't see a reason for those alsorithms but if
> they are needed for policy or political reasons, let's add them and
> forget about it.
Are those the only two in GnuPG you don't see a need for? What
a
access and re-flashed the firmware, the controller would notice and fail
> to load.
>
> It also has a physical write-protect switch that can prevent unwanted
> writes.
Since a flash drive is a read/write device, when would writes be
unwanted? When should I use this?
--
Whitey
n email privacy system.
Which might explain why some Linux distros are lax about updating GnuPG.
Ancient versions work o.k. for package verification.
--
Whitey
"To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights
of the hearer as well as those of the s