-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello!
I'm currenly using GnuPG 1.4.2 on WinXP SP2 and I have a problem:
When I write
gpg -d file.ext.asc
I receive long output of hard readable characters and PC Speaker loud
beeping. I can stop this only by manual ending processes cmd.exe an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello.
Recently I submitted my key to PGP Global Directory and received a
verification request. I can't check it't signature, I see the following:
OpenPGP Security Info
Unverified signature
gpg command line and output:
C:\\Program Files\\GNU\\
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
David Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:24:22PM +0400, lusfert wrote:
>
>>Hello.
>>
>>Recently I submitted my key to PGP Global Directory and received a
>>verification request. I can't check
Hello.
How can I change text (not by manually editing) in armor headers (for
example, "Version:") or armor headers themselves (add, remove)? Will it
affect compatibility with other applications?
Can I put custom text into "Version:" in stage of exporting public key,
making signatures, encrypting
nidhog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you guys have any suggestion as to how to go about encrypting a
> partition that can be available both to linux and win32?
>
> Thanks.
>
I know 2 cross-platform solutions: CrossCrypt
(http://www.scherrer.cc/crypt/) and FreeOTFE (http://www.freeotfe.org/).
I haven't tri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 04:30:41PM +0400, lusfert wrote:
>
>>I know 2 cross-platform solutions: CrossCrypt
>>
>
> A quote from the CrossCrypt homepage: "Denaiablity: You will not be able
> to tell that this file has been encrypted by f
Alphax wrote:
> lusfert wrote:
>
>>>Hello.
>>>
>>>How can I change text (not by manually editing) in armor headers (for
>>>example, "Version:") or armor headers themselves (add, remove)? Will it
>>>affect compatibility with other applic
t; file.gpg > file
gpg: public key is 0xBF3D3DC2
gpg: using subkey 0xBF3D3DC2 instead of primary key 0x500B8987
gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit ELG-E key, ID 0xBF3D3DC2, created 2005-08-06
"lusfert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg: TWOFISH encrypted data
gpg: original file name=
Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Ok,.. I know that you can set at least the following flags to specify
> the purpose of a key:
> A - authorsation
> C - certification
> E - encryption
> S - signation
>
What does type "A" mean and where is it used?
--
With best regards,
Current OpenPGP key ID: 0
David Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 07:17:01PM +0300, lusfert wrote:
>
>>Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Ok,.. I know that you can set at least the following flags to specify
>>>the purpose of a key:
>>>A - authorsation
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi all.
I wrote some text (with non-ASCII characters) in file encoded in UTF-8
with BOM and save it.
Then I decided to clearsign it:
gpg --verbose -u 0x500B8987 --clearsign 1.txt
When I open clearsigned 1.txt.asc I can find symbol U+FEFF (Zero
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
David Shaw wrote on 26.11.2005, Сб 18:30:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 06:01:49PM +0300, lusfert wrote:
>>
>>When I open clearsigned 1.txt.asc I can find symbol U+FEFF (Zero width
>>no-break space) before message, but after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
David Shaw wrote on 27.11.2005 1:05:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:18:08AM +0300, lusfert wrote:
>
>>David Shaw wrote on 26.11.2005, Сб 18:30:
>>
>>>U+FEFF is the BOM character. It was in the original document, so it&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Nicky wrote on 27.12.2005 22:06:
> What does the usage letters mean in the key listing?
> usage: CS
> usage: SEA
> What does SEA stand for? I think S and E stand for Signing and
> Encryption respectively but what about A and C?
>
S - Signing
E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Patrick Plattes wrote on 05.01.2006 2:13:
> Realos wrote:
>
>> hello,
>>
>> I have found an old pair of private and public keys but unfortunaltely
>> do no remember the corresponding password. Public key is places on key
>> servers, thus I would
Hello.
I downloaded GnuPG source and checked its signature (under Windows):
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.2.tar.bz2
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.2.tar.bz2.sig
Then I rebooted into recently installed Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r0a system
and built program from source:
$ cd /ho
John Clizbe wrote on 05.01.2006 19:50:
> lusfert wrote:
>>Thus BZIP2 algorithm isn't supported after compiling GnuPG 1.4.2 from
>>source code under Linux.
>>How can I enable BZIP2 support using last version of GPG under Linux?
>
>
> What was the output from co
Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote on 06.01.2006 16:34:
> lusfert wrote:
>>$ cd ./gnupg-1.4.2
>>$ ./configure
>
>
> Where did the output go? To /dev/null?
Output was on the screen...
> Since you are not
> using C Shell (please use bash, sh, of ksh),do it this way:
Werner Koch wrote on 23.01.2006 18:01:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:25:18 +0100, Patrick Brunschwig said:
>
>> Does GPGOL install gpg, or does it modify the path to the GnuPG home
>> directory?
>
> Yes, it installs gpg into the same location as the new installer of
> gpg does. The HOMEDIR is the user
Nuno Donato wrote on 19.01.2006 0:44:
> hello
>
> i've recently installed gnupg to be able to communicate with some
> persons who are using PGP (i like free alternatives :)
> before installing i certified that both systems were compatible.
> i sucessfully created my private and public keys and we
Jean-David Beyer wrote on 23.01.2006 21:03:
> I have recently switched ISP, but I also upgraded Thunderbird at the same
> time.
>
As I can see in armor header you are using _very old_ GnuPG version.
1.2.1 has a serious vulnerability, please update GnuPG immediately. For
details read this announce
Benjamin Esham wrote on 20.02.2006 7:50:
> John Clizbe wrote:
>> Earthlink and Google's GMail use https on their signin page then then
>> switch
>> over to http once authenticated
>
> I saw a neat trick somewhere online... if you use
> "https://mail.google.com"; as your
> login page for Gmail, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Anders Eriksson wrote on 23.03.2006 12:14:
>> Why are you using GPG 1.2.1? There have been several security
>> bugs detected since then, including a few in the last month;
>> you should upgrade to 1.4.2.2 ASAP.
>>
> I just did and now WinPT does
Teichmeier, Heiko wrote on 23.03.2006 9:11:
> Can anyone tell me - exist a public GPG-Keyserver into the internet with
> LDAP-protocol as access-way? If this is true, than tell us the
> adress(es), please.
>
ldap://keyserver.pgp.com/
--
Regards
OpenPGP Key ID: 0x9E353B56500B8987
Encrypted e-mai
Hi.
Is it possible to change date format in GPG output?
When I see
D:\>gpg --verify gnupg-w32cli-1.4.3.exe.sig
gpg: Signature made 04/03/06 14:42:33
gpg:using RSA key 0x1CE0C630
gpg: Good signature from "Werner Koch (dist sig) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
I don't understand what date do
David Shaw wrote on 07.04.2006 1:43:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:31:40AM +0400, lusfert wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Is it possible to change date format in GPG output?
>
> GPG uses whatever the OS specifies as the date format. It is not
> something that is changeable by
John W. Moore III wrote on 07.04.2006 2:37:
> David Shaw wrote:
>
>>> OS setting via LC_TIME, according to Microsoft, though I have no idea
>>> how to set it on win32.
>
> Right Click on the Clock, Select Setting Time/Date.
>
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a142/someuser00/right_click_on_clock
John Clizbe wrote on 07.04.2006 15:13:
> lusfert wrote:
>> John W. Moore III wrote on 07.04.2006 2:37:
>>> David Shaw wrote:
>>>
>>>>> OS setting via LC_TIME, according to Microsoft, though I have no idea
>>>>> how to set it on win32.
>&
Mica Mijatovic wrote on 2006-04-07 4:24:
> Was Fri, 07 Apr 2006, at 01:31:40 +0400,
> when lusfert wrote:
>
>>> Is it possible to change date format in GPG output?
>
> I tried this to figure out many times but couldn't.
>
> I also expected that
29 matches
Mail list logo
