Re: [Sks-devel] [Announcement] SKS 1.1.5 Released

2014-05-06 Thread benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org writes: The RPMs aren't signed in the normal way within the RPMs but rather with gpg-generated signatures (you'll see when you ; I haven't figured that bit out. These RPMs should now be correctly signed with my usual key (0x1236602B). -- David Be

Re: [Sks-devel] [Announcement] SKS 1.1.5 Released

2014-05-06 Thread benfell
I used the patches from the latest Fedora 1.1.4 source RPM and adapted its spec file to use a source downloaded from the official site. They are available at https://disunitedstates.org/rpm/ -- David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you do not understand the attachment.

Re: legally binding digital sigs (Atom Smasher)

2005-09-23 Thread David Benfell
asonably foreseeable, for the validity of such signatures is probably still open to challenge. If possible, obtain paper authorizations from all participants agreeing to use electronic signatures. -- David Benfell, LCP [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/ __