invalid gpg key revocation

2012-03-04 Thread auto15963931
Hello. Supposing I create a key with an arbitrary user ID, and it contains an email address that is not real but exists only for sake of having a key to use for signing and encrypting with a pseudonym, and supposing I make the public key available by putting a copy of it on an anonymous website

Re: invalid gpg key revocation

2012-03-05 Thread auto15963931
I am 99.9% sure no one has gotten access to my machine or my keys. If they had, I have to believe that there would have been more damage done than this, and that does not appear to have happened. I mention the details, which may seem irrelevant, only because sometimes the devil is in the detail

invalid gpg key revocation

2012-03-06 Thread auto15963931
___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: invalid gpg key revocation

2012-03-06 Thread auto15963931
Okay, there are a lot of responses, and I need to get to the bottom of this as quickly as possible, but I also want to do so methodically. Let me respond to the points raised as best I can until this is resolved. > -Original Message- > From: gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org [mailto:gnupg

Re: invalid gpg key revocation

2012-03-06 Thread auto15963931
> -Original Message- > From: gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org [mailto:gnupg-users- boun...@gnupg.org] > On Behalf Of Ingo Klöcker > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 3:37 PM > To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org > Subject: Re: invalid gpg key revocation > > On Sunday 04 March 2012, Robert J. Hansen wrote: >

signature verification data

2012-03-24 Thread auto15963931
When an encrypted file sent to me is both encrypted and signed, when I use a command like this: gpg -o file-out -d file-in I can see the signature verification data appear as standard output, in the terminal, while the file-out contents are separated from it. Is there a way to have the signa

Re: signature verification data

2012-03-26 Thread auto15963931
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:18:37 + Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >On 03/25/2012 02:33 AM, auto15963...@hushmail.com wrote: >> When an encrypted file sent to me is both encrypted and signed, >> when I use a command like this: >> >> gpg -o file-out -d file-in >> >> >> I can see the signature verific

using this list

2012-03-26 Thread auto15963931
I noticed that this list is also available on gmane as "gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user", which allows retrieving the messages in a newsreader in lieu of in email. I prefer the newsreader format. Is there any reason I cannot remain subscribed with this same email address as the user ID but sto

pinentry

2012-04-04 Thread auto15963931
I use gpg on Windows OS. On the command line when I use this command: gpg -d filename.asc a pinentry window pops up requesting my passphrase. If it happens that the message was encrypted with the option --throw-keyids, then the pinentry window, not knowing which key was used, starts with one

Re: [admin] Re: signature verification data

2012-04-04 Thread auto15963931
On 3/27/2012 12:55 PM, Werner Koch wrote: > Hi, > > please remember to strip your quotes down to a reasonable size. > > > Shalom-Salam, > >Werner > Shalom to you likewise. My bad, Werner! Thanks for the reminder about your preferences. What is this url for: gmane-disc...@hawk.netfonds.no

Re: pinentry

2012-04-07 Thread auto15963931
On 4/4/2012 9:50 PM, Hauke Laging wrote: > This does not happen here (Linux, though). Hauke, hello. I expect when I get to the bottom of it all, I will find the fault is caused not by Windows but by my error or need for an adjustment of some kind. I was hoping that my description would trigger so

message signature types

2012-07-31 Thread auto15963931
If this is the wrong place to ask, please point me in the right direction. Where can I learn more about importing, if such a thing is even done this way, and making use of message signatures which utilize an "smime.p7s" file? I got a message from someone who uses this, and I need to learn about ver

Re: message signature types

2012-08-01 Thread auto15963931
Charly Avital: > auto15963931 July 31, 2012 2:47:22 PM wrote: >> If this is the wrong place to ask, please point me in the right >> direction. Where can I learn more about importing, if such a thing is >> even done this way, and making use of message signatures which uti

Re: message signature types

2012-08-01 Thread auto15963931
Werner Koch: > On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:50, auto15963...@hushmail.com said: > >> So the last question is just how do I go about checking whether one of >> these smime.p7s certificates has been revoked. What is the process of >> revocation in general? Thanks. > > There are three ways: > > - Using

Re: message signature types

2012-08-02 Thread auto15963931
Werner Koch: > On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:54, auto15963...@hushmail.com said: > >> I already have Gpg installed, as well as GPA, but I have not used them >> for smime, which is, I think, what I hear you say I can do? In any case, > > If you have X.509 certifciates (from S/MIME) oth, GPA and Kleopatra

how vulnerable is "hidden-encrypt-to"

2012-08-17 Thread auto15963931
Is there any way on heaven or earth for someone to discover from a message, one sent to them or to another person, whether the encrypted message had been made with an option "hidden-encrypt-to" or what key ID had been used in conjunction with that option? Thanks. _

Re: how vulnerable is "hidden-encrypt-to"

2012-08-17 Thread auto15963931
Hauke Laging: > Am Fr 17.08.2012, 09:56:56 schrieb auto15963931: >> Is there any way on heaven or earth for someone to discover from a >> message, one sent to them or to another person, whether the encrypted >> message had been made with an option "hidden-encrypt-to&