I can correspond with absolute comfort knowing that there was absolutely no
leakage of my mail" (Steve Gibson, Gibson Research)
"Since I started working with top-secret documents, I have been using GPG"
(Bruce Schneier)
Thanks!
Sam.
--
Sam Tuke
Campaign Manager
Gnu Privacy Guard
ation is important.
If you don't agree then you can skip this thread. I realise it's an unusual one
and I don't wish to disturb the usual business of supporting users here.
Best,
Sam.
--
Sam Tuke
Campaign Manager
Gnu Privacy Guard
0044 78680 77871
signature.asc
Description: Op
On 31/10/13 22:47, Paul R. Ramer wrote:
> Well, here is my input for your project.
>
> I wouldn't be able to communicate sensitive documents without it.
Many thanks Paul!
Sam.
--
Sam Tuke
Campaign Manager
Gnu Privacy Guard
0044 78680 77871
signature.asc
Description: O
ng
> eavesdropping. It's one of the most important tools I use every day.
Thanks Martin - that last sentence is great even by itself.
Best,
Sam.
- --
Sam Tuke
Campaign Manager
Gnu Privacy Guard
0044 78680 77871
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: U
xplore this off-list; sounds like you've got some interesting
ideas.
Best,
Sam.
--
Sam Tuke
Campaign Manager
Gnu Privacy Guard
0044 78680 77871
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/11/13 17:38, kwadronaut wrote:
> GnuPG might be clumsy, but it gets my message across, to the intendent
> recipients!
Thanks kwadronaut. You're highlighting the signing aspect here I presume?
Best,
Sam.
- --
Sam Tuke
Campaign
On 02/11/13 17:43, Johannes Zarl wrote:
> "My handwriting is unique. With GPG, so is my email."
Brilliant, thanks! Admirably concise.
Sam.
--
Sam Tuke
Campaign Manager
Gnu Privacy Guard
0044 78680 77871
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digi
On 03/11/13 20:13, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> As a Debian user, I rely on GnuPG to ensure that the software I install hasn't
> been tampered with.
Excellent thanks Daniel!
Sam.
--
Sam Tuke
Campaign Manager
Gnu Privacy Guard
0044 78680 77871
signature.asc
Description: Open
got some very good people on our
> social media team.
Great - I am planning to use one, and I'll keep you posted.
Sam.
--
Sam Tuke
Campaign Manager
Gnu Privacy Guard
0044 78680 77871
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
G
ently.
Best,
Sam.
- --
Sam Tuke
Campaign Manager
Gnu Privacy Guard
0044 78680 77871
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iF4EAREIAAYFAlJ6MiwACgkQ1bR1Itj7YQXMTAEAgFLrka0zg5O1PSYY3payscWI
/G7aRd8EO0Zx+seFT
s letters"
"I use GnuPG because ?I won't trade my independence for anything"
Best,
Sam.
- --
Sam Tuke
Campaign Manager
Gnu Privacy Guard
0044 78680 77871
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with
7;re raising money to rebuild the website, could you add
> HTTPS to your to do list?
I guess you're referring to the blog (gnupg.org is HTTPS accessible, but
blog.gnupg.org is not)? The new site will host the blog on a single (not sub)
domain, so all pages will be reachable by an encrypted co
On 14/12/13 21:27, Zechariah Seth wrote:
> Will GnuPG blogs be cross-posted to the gnupg-users list? :)
I could do that if others are happy with the idea. Any objections? Werner?
Best,
Sam.
--
Sam Tuke
Campaign Manager
Gnu Privacy Guard
Tel: +49 176 81923811
IM: samt...@jabber.fsfe.
On 17/12/13 16:07, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> If the expected volume is low-ish (e.g. no more than once a week or so)
> i think that would be a great thing to do.
Yes it's unlikely to be more than that.
Best,
Sam.
--
Sam Tuke
Campaign Manager
Gnu Privacy Guard
Tel: +49 176 819238
pages that
critically need to be https it seems to me. Anywhere that source files are
provided clearly needs to be secure. Ideally the manual pages too. But the
front page has no need in my opinion.
Sam.
- --
Sam Tuke
Campaign Manager
Gnu Privacy Guard
Tel: +49 176 81923811
IM: samt...@jabber.fsfe.org
Getting Goteo approval
==
Posted 18th December 2013 by Sam Tuke
http://blog.gnupg.org/20131218-getting-goteo-approval.html
The targets are set, the rewards are prepared, the press release has been edited
and translated, and now we’re waiting for approval from the crowdfunding
Yes we've reached 109% of the minimum goal - thanks to everyone who contributed
for your support!
Sam.
Christophe Brocas wrote:
>Le 19/12/2013 11:08, Werner Koch a écrit :
>> GnuPG encryption project launches crowdfunding campaign
>>
>> Today GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) has launched its first cr
Wow that's progress - clearly the newfound attention of 800 digital privacy
advocates is having an effect at Goteo.
Sam.
MFPA wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA512
>
>Hi
>
>
>On Thursday 19 December 2013 at 4:22:05 PM, in
>, Olav Seyfarth wrote:
>
>
>
>> One note: apart fro
How is STEED progressing? What is the current status of the project?
Best,
Sam.
--
Sam Tuke
British Team Coordinator
Free Software Foundation Europe
IM : samt...@jabber.fsfe.org
Latest UK Free Software news: uk.fsfe.org
Is freedom important to you? Join the fellowship.fsfe.org
signature.asc
19 matches
Mail list logo
