Why are my signatures being labelled as bad?

2006-04-21 Thread Robert Smits
ted files from work arrive at home and decrypt just fine. Signed files and encrypted files from home arrive at work just fine. Can anyone point me in the correct direction? Thanks -- Robert Smits Exec Ass't Ph 753-0201 Fax 753-2954 Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re: Why are my signatures being labelled as bad?

2006-04-26 Thread Robert Smits
On Monday 24 April 2006 04:25, John W. Moore III wrote: > Bob Smits wrote: > >> I have found on the keyservers two keys that seem to belong to you: > >> (1) Robert Smits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> 1024 bit RSA key 49E9AF38, created: 2006-04-

Re: Why are my signatures being labelled as bad?

2006-04-27 Thread Robert Smits
signature. > > You might try sending a signed message to the list; maybe some clue > could be found. OK, here is a message to the list that is signed by me as [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Robert Smits Exec Ass't Ph 753-0201 Fax 753-2954 Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpIz

Why are signatures marked as bad?

2006-12-22 Thread Robert Smits
I'm using the KGpg that comes with Suse 10.1. I use the KDE desktop and hence Kmail to send my email. When I sign a message with my personal key, when it leaves my outbox the message is marked by a green banner saying "Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID: 0xA3DF27D8336EF8A7). The s

Re: Why are signatures marked as bad?

2006-12-23 Thread Robert Smits
On Thursday 21 December 2006 22:44, Robert Smits wrote: > I'm using the KGpg that comes with Suse 10.1. I use the KDE desktop and > hence Kmail to send my email. > > When I sign a message with my personal key, when it leaves my outbox the > message is marked by a green banner

Making Progress, Still having Bad Signatures.

2006-12-29 Thread Robert Smits
As some of you may know, I've been having bad signatures on my SuSE 10.1 KDE install. I use Knontact/Kmail/Kgpg for mail. Messages I send to myself that are gpg signed are coming back marked as having bad signatures. This occurs whether or not the keys are exported to key servers. I have exper

Still Bad Signatures - KGPG seems broken

2006-12-31 Thread Robert Smits
I've been trying for some time to figure out why messages from me that are gpg signed come back to me with the signature marked bad. I run three different computers all with SuSE 10.1, and use KMail/Kontact/Kgpg for all my email. Whenever I send my own signature to either a mailing list or to

Re: Making Progress, Still having Bad Signatures.

2006-12-31 Thread Robert Smits
On Saturday 30 December 2006 05:00, Michael Kallas wrote: > Hi, > > > Here is the discovery. When I look at mail in the sent box in kmail, the > > signatures are marked as good signatures, but the sig id has changed. > > > > The key signature has an id of 0x3E6E37DA when I look in the KGpg key > >

Re: Still Bad Signatures - KGPG seems broken

2007-01-01 Thread Robert Smits
On Monday 01 January 2007 05:48, Olaf Gellert wrote: > Robert Smits wrote: > > Since I can send a message from the Windows Partition through my ISP and > > I can receive it on either my Linux partition or my Windows partition > > with a good signature I come to the conclusi

Re: Still Bad Signatures - KGPG seems broken

2007-01-03 Thread Robert Smits
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 17:55, Chris wrote: > On Tuesday 02 January 2007 12:11 pm, Doug Barton wrote: > > Robert Smits wrote: > > > No, it only seems to happen to me. That is, If I send a message to > > > someone else it's normal and the sig is good. But if I se

Re: How to sign mail and news under Windows system by using GnuPG?

2007-04-05 Thread Robert Smits
On Thursday 05 April 2007 17:48, Moses wrote: > Hi list, > > Could anybody tell me how to sign a email under Windows by using > GnuPG? I've done some google, but could not find any Windows mail > client support GnuPG. Furthermore, I also want use GnuPG in Outlook > Express to sign mails and news, c