I am a bit confused about the gnupg behaviour in case of revoking a
subkey or uid. Since uids are actually signed by others in combination
my public key.
Does it mean revoking a subkey or uid rsults in loss of signatures I
have collected over the time? How to proceed in such a case?
--
Luqman M
empty uid, i.e. without any email address and
requesting people to sign that uid in addition to respective UIDs with
email address?
--
Realos
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
and
the using it to sign my new UID.
What do you mean by:
>but it does not resolve the "this key is untrusted - use it
>anyway?" question unless people select the key using the empty UID.
If i use that UID to sign my other IDs doesn't it make sense??
cheers,
--
Rea
sign my other IDs doesn't it make sense??
Ok, this was a mistake. A key signs other keys/UIDs; a UID does not sign
other UIDs.
regards,
:
--
Realos
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
these commands in "gpg" software but am
unclear what to use.
Generally, I expect keyservers to handle revocation of any key
components better than just deletion for obvious reasons.
Is there a *goog* documentation about what keyserver can handle and what not?
merci,
but no special not
about configuration file is give.
Any help/hint is much appreciated.
Regards.
--
Realos
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
f servers. It seems to be a very
small change in protocol. Verification of identity by challenge/response
and allowing more than one keys attached to same email address.
Why have this found it's way into server protocol implementations?
Are there any hidden probl
me. My email address globally indicates
>>>which David Shaw I am.
>>
>>
>>Isn't this why some people use UIDs like "John Doe (Amsterdam, The
>>Netherlands, 1970-01-01)" next to the email-ones?
>
>I don't get th
her there are 10 or only 1 David Shaws
listen of server if you know which key you have verfied.
But as far as I know this concept is not taken into consideration in
current gpg implementations.
--
Realos
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ber and such other servers. Such servers have the disadvatage of
not syncing with other public servers and only allowing one public key
per email address.
Are there any other drawbacks of Biglumber?
--
Realos
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@
ding a few more options was not working so I thought they might have
to be preceeded by some "set " or something like that.
Now after your email, I checked again and there was a typing mistake :)
Thanks and Salam/Shalom ;)
--
Realos
_
>Not TRUE, I have 2 Keys listed on BL with the same email address.
>However they have different BL assigned passwords, so they are Separate
>Listings!
So, you have some difference on uids for these 2 keys? Like different
entry in name or description?
-
s a sort-of keyserver.
Yeah, it does not support hkp protocol but that is not an issue for me
at the moment. I just see some advatages of BL like key signing announcements
and key replacements as a big plus for me in the beginning.
Some time in future I will move on
nge/response fails.
--
Realos
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
if I know part of the password? What tool is suitable for that?
Thanks in anticipation.
Regards,
--
Realos
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
15 matches
Mail list logo
