trickyboy wrote:
> I generated a GnuPG certificate but I see that I have two
> self-signatures for each of my userID:
>
> gpg> check
> uid John Doe
> sig!3ABCD1234 2015-06-18 [self-signature]
> sig!3ABCD1234 2015-06-14 [self-signature]
> uid John Doe
> sig!3ABCD1234
David Carter wrote:
> We currently use Gnupg 1.4.10
>
> This is a sample of how we would call
> gpg to encrypt a text file prior to transmission:
>
> gpg -c -o DataFile.gpg --batch --compress-algo 1 --cipher-algocast5
> --passphrase KeyValue DataFile.txt
>
> The files that we receive share
i do testing
unix line end conf is ok on windows
of course dos line end is ok too
utf8-bom, unicode, unicode-be
file formats all fail
> gpg -K --options utf8-bom-conf.txt
gpg: utf8-bom-conf.txt:1: invalid option
> gpg -K --options unicode-be-conf.txt
gpg: unicode-be-conf.txt:1: invalid option
On 2013-02-23, Jerry wrote:
>
> Well, each to his/her own I suppose; however, I would not approve of
> the file being sent to my PC regardless. There is always the
> possibility of the email being intercepted and exploited or my PC being
> compromised.
There is a security element to this, but it
>Figuring out how to install an app is not the problem. Figuring out
>how to *use OpenPGP* is the problem. The app is not the same as the
>amount of specialized knowledge required to use the app successfully.
The installation problem takes care of the other. Hushmail users need
not know any mor
There is a related issue. Assume you are a tor user. Go to
irc.oftc.net, channel #tor. This is where tor users hang out.
There you will find some person on there called "arma." This is one of
the main authors for Tor.
But is he? Are you really on some MITM attack IRC server with all fake
b
Hi, I would like to create an "anonymous" key to be posted
or handed out.
I don't want to fill in real name, email, etc.
Is there a way to do this? Or at least some common default
options for these fields?
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gn
BUMP please.
I am having issues with the --try-secret-key, it is giving
"invalid command" or something.
My bash is a bit crappy but I am sure someone on this list can
tell me the answer in 2 seconds.
gpg --try-secret-key m...@gpg.key file
or what?
Thanks
_
"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
> Not even then. "Plausible deniability" is a myth, an ephemera. One
> person may believe your denials; another may not. Whether they
> believe you will have much more to do with how honest you've been the
> rest of the time than with the particulars of cryptography
> But it can also mean it can mean PLAUSIBLE GUILTY (PG). And
> while PD works only once, PG can go ad infinitum. And don't forget
> there are some organisations which activate worldwide for which any
> suspicion means guilty without any respect for the facts.
>
So does threatening the public-
Martin T wrote:
> I need to create a public and private key pair for a person
> representing an organization, upload the public key to RIPE(regional
> Internet registry in Europe) public server, create some database
> entries using those public and private keys and finally hand over the
> private
I use thunderbird on my laptop and desktop with an IMAP server, and
I've been mailing myself encrypted mails with website passwords so I
have access to them on both computers.
This is just as secure as encrypting a file and copying it onto both
computers without using e-mail as a medium, right?
O
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> I use thunderbird on my laptop and desktop with an IMAP server, and
> I've been mailing myself encrypted mails with website passwords so I
> have access to them on both computers.
>
> This is just as secure as encrypting a file and copying it onto both
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Nomen Nescio wrote:
> > Given that this is an IMAP account it's possible those temp
> > files exist on the IMAP server. :-(
>
> Can you point me to an IMAP client which does this
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > Maybe you should think things through, or God forbid even run a
> > few tests or something before puffing your chest there Robert.
> > Especially when you're in the unenviable position of potentialy
> > being your own proof of concept.
>
> I don't know why you have suc
15 matches
Mail list logo
