scheme in Libgcrypt.
Very nice. Support for Curve25519 would make me far more likely to use
ECC in GnuPG. Doubts about NIST curves aside, it has security features
not present in e.g. P-256. It's also a lot faster.
Nicolai
___
Gnupg-users mailing
Thanks a lot for all answers regarding my question regarding GPG and bcc.
Allow me to summarize what I learned for both:
- double checking that I understood everything correctly
- documenting this for others
(I found no place where it is explained;
therefore also the change in the subject)
In
lues fall under it?
If "trust a key" is fine I could describe the effect of trust-model
always as something like:
- "Always trust all keys (except disabled/expired/revoked)"
If you don't like the term "trust a key" what else intuitive terminology
do you sugges
Am 22.04.2014 12:56, Hauke Laging schrieb/wrote:
> Am Di 22.04.2014, 12:25:04 schrieb Nicolai Josuttis:
>
>> So the next question is: Is "trust a key" a valid term?
>
> The better question is: "Is it a useful term?"
>
> I consider this confusion a h
Before we continue to discuss "trust" and "valid",
allow me again to raise some technical questions regarding
GPG options and values, which I at least didn't understand
by reading docs and (roughly) source code
(but I need a clear understanding to program a frontend on it).
a) What is the effect o
mbination with Enigmail.
> You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
> My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter>
>
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
>
--
Nicolai M. Josuttis
www.josuttis.de
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
between safe and unsafe mode.
(The unsafe mode is very important to send more
encrypted emails to help those who really need encryption).
Am 23.04.2014 01:03, Hauke Laging schrieb/wrote:
> Am Mi 23.04.2014, 00:50:24 schrieb Nicolai Josuttis:
>
>> In enigmail a user enable
e at all).
> Option "automatically send encrypted"
a) "never (except according to recipient rules)"
b) "if we have authenticated keys for all email addresses"
with tooltip
"auto send encrypted if all keys for all email addresses
are technically valid
Am 25.04.2014 19:43, Bernard Tyers schrieb/wrote:
> At the risk of being flamed, can I suggest asking the users what
> they think?
>
> Nicolai, by the look of it you've carried out some user research.
> I guess so by the "real world" discussion you posted in a m
l so that people (are able to) know what they do
when they trust this key server and therefore its casual signed keys.
What do you think about this idea?
Was it ever discussed?
--
Nicolai M. Josuttis
www.josuttis.de
PGP Fingerprint: EA25 EF48 BF20 01E4 1FAB 0C1C DEF
ive up to the hopes people
> had for it? Not really.
>
>
> _______
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
>
--
Nicolai M. Josuttis
www.josuttis.de
PGP Fingerp
to reach out and fund these projects
because without these projects the journalism
that Glenn [Greenwald] and I and Jake have done
would literally not be possible
Am 30.12.2014 um 00:51 schrieb MFPA:
> I'm not entirely sure how this relates to the thread in which you
> pos
nd I and Jake have done
would literally not be possible
--
Nicolai M. Josuttis
www.josuttis.de
PGP Fingerprint: EA25 EF48 BF20 01E4 1FAB 0C1C DEF9 FC80 8A1C 44D0
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi,
I'd like an account on dev.gnupg.org please.
* Handle one of: janl, niclan, niclangf
* Display name: Nicolai Langfeldt
* Email: j...@langfeldt.net
I did try to use the github login that appeared to be available but this
did not work.
Thanks,
Nicolai Lang
Thanks, it arrived before your email!
On 22.08.2024 09:46, Werner Koch wrote:
Hi,
You should soon receive a confirmation mail.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/g
s a RFC?
- Other thoughts?
And BTW, if this is too much out of scope of GnuPG issues:
- What would be the right place to discuss such a thing?
Best
Nico
--
Nicolai M. Josuttis
www.josuttis.de
mailto:n...@enigmail.net
PGP fingerprint: CFEA 3B9F 9D8E B52D BD3F 7AF6 1C16 A70A F92D 28F5
___
gt; A more simple way of tackling this is to use PKA or DANE for key
> validation: For sending mail you already need DNS and thus it would
> be easy to retrieve the matching key from the DNS. The drawback is
> that this must be configured by the key owner and can't be changed
&g
17 matches
Mail list logo
