Generating bitwise identical keyrings with GnuPG 1 + 2

2019-08-18 Thread Mihai Moldovan
Hi I am working on a software package alike to Debian's debian-archive-keyring. Within that, public keys are stored in a jetring-compatible format. At build time, these keys are essentially read/imported and concatenated in a non-kbx-keyring. Maintainers, for sanity, are supposed to build the ke

Re: Generating bitwise identical keyrings with GnuPG 1 + 2

2019-09-13 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 9/6/19 12:33 AM, Ángel wrote: I'm baffled by this. Could you run gpg2 --list-packets on both keyrings and compare their outputs? That should hint which packets are being included by 1.4 that are not by 2.2 Hmm, interesting indeed. The output is *almost* the same. A diff looks like that

37.191.231.105 (part of keyserver pool) redirects to ... unknown location?

2019-09-16 Thread Mihai Moldovan
Hi Since I know that the keyserver maintainers follow this list, I wonder what happened to 37.191.231.105, which is part of the keyserver pool? It currently HTTP-301-redirects to https://analytics.sumptuouscapital.com/ - which also means that requests to URLs like http://keys.gnupg.net will some

Re: Generating bitwise identical keyrings with GnuPG 1 + 2

2019-09-16 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 9/15/19 3:56 PM, Werner Koch wrote: > The trust packets are for internal use of gpg and are never exported. But... that's the whole point. gpg 1.4 seems to export them, while gpg 2.x does not. > These packets are one of the reasons why we stated for decades that the > interface is "gpg --

Re: 37.191.231.105 (part of keyserver pool) redirects to ... unknown location?

2019-09-16 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 9/16/19 3:27 PM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:11, io...@ionic.de said: > >> which also means that requests to URLs like http://keys.gnupg.net will >> sometimes >> redirect a user to that location. > > That is not correct. For quite some time that address is a hardwired to >