Hi there,
I tried to generate test keys with expired user IDs (under faked
system time), but I failed, with gpg 1.4 as well as 2.1.8. I tried
to use the options default-sig-expire and default-cert-expire as
well as ask-sig-expire and ask-cert-expire when adding user IDs via
--edit-key.
However,
Hi Daniel!
On 2015-09-29, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Fri 2015-09-25 00:49:48 -0700, Jens Lechtenboerger wrote:
>
>> I tried to generate test keys with expired user IDs (under faked
>> system time), but I failed, with gpg 1.4 as well as 2.1.8.
>
> with 2.1.8, i get
Hi there,
I fail to use gpgsm from 2.1.9 with empty passphrases for test keys.
(2.0.x works with the workaround described there:
https://bugs.gnupg.org/gnupg/issue2126)
I’m using gpgsm compiled via “make -f build-aux/speedo.mk native”
with exported PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
In the directory wit
Dear reader,
I’m experimenting with gpgsm and dirmngr. Please redirect me to a
more appropriate mailing list, if it exists.
Does dirmngr only speak LDAPv2? If I configure a LDAPv3 server, it
complains about the “historical protocol” upon bind from dirmngr.
This appears to indicate use of v2 by
Hi there,
gpgsm has the option encrypt-to, which is not mentioned in the man
page. Is that option stable or might it disappear in the future?
Thanks
Jens
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-
Hi there,
after I imported my private key into gpgsm, it was not trusted for
signatures by gpgsm, because the root CA was not trusted.
After enabling allow-mark-trusted in gpg-agent.conf, gpg-agent asks
whether I trust the root CA. Saying "yes" creates
~/.gnupg/trustlist.txt with the root certif
On Mi, Dez 18 2013, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> I am using Xemacs, gnus the epa pkg for encrypting s/mime using gpgsm.
>
> I have several email accounts with different (comodo certificates).
> Now one certificate for the address addre...@gmail.com has expired.
>
> However I want to send an email from add
On So, Dez 15 2013, Jens Lechtenboerger wrote:
> Does dirmngr only speak LDAPv2? If I configure a LDAPv3 server, it
> complains about the “historical protocol” upon bind from dirmngr.
> This appears to indicate use of v2 by dirmngr.
As a workaround I retrieve certificates with l
On Sa, Dez 21 2013, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> I am on Kubuntu 10.04 and I have both gnupg and gnupg2 installed. Now
> since 2.x is not affected by the problem mentioned I prefer to use
> it. However how can I be sure that gnupg2 is used for my email
> correspondence for which I use pgp-mime and not gnup
On So, Dez 22 2013, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> "Jens" == Jens Lechtenboerger
>> P.S. Do you know Mail-Followup-To (MFT)?
>
> hm, I am reading this group via gmane (and news) I use simply
> gnus-summary-followup-with-original which results in a mail
> to Newsgroups:
Hi there,
I’m posting this via gmane with header “Mail-Copies-To: never”,
which should be translated to an MFT header by Gmane (see
http://gmane.org/post.php).
From the Message manual:
For instance, if you're running Gnus and wish to insert a
`Mail-Copies-To' header in all your news articles and
On 2014-09-18, Werner Koch wrote:
> To quickly build all required software without installing it, the
> Speedo method may be used:
>
> make -f build-aux/speedo.mk native
I get this:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
autogen.sh: cross compiler kit not installed
a
On 2014-09-23, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:29, lech...@wi.uni-muenster.de said:
>
>>> make -f build-aux/speedo.mk native
>>
>> I get this:
>> autogen.sh: cross compiler kit not installed
>
> You seem to be building for Windows but I wonder how you did this given that
>
> TARGET
On 2014-09-25, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:56, lech...@wi.uni-muenster.de said:
>
>> This is what happens if I extract gnupg-2.1.0-beta834.tar.bz2 and
>> execute that command on Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS.
>
> Hmmm. The first call to gnupg's autogen.sh is
>
> ./autogen.sh --silent --prin
On 2014-10-21, Philip Jackson wrote:
> It then treats the other protocol, PC/SC, but all it says is "TODO
> - To use PC/SC make sure you disable CCID by passing the
> --disable-ccid option to GnuPG."
>
> From this I assumed that CCID was perhaps either preferred / more
> important / more useful /
Hi there,
I cannot sign messages with gpgsm any more. beta834 was (and is)
still working, with beta864 and beta895 invalid signatures are
created:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
echo "Hi" > test.txt
gnupg-2.1.0-beta864/sm/gpgsm -o test.txt.sig --sign test.txt
gp
On 2014-10-29, Werner Koch wrote:
> The only changes for gpgsm since beta834 are related to the key
> storage. Without any log output I can't help very much. Please
> check that the correct gpg-agent is used and not some older
> version - has it been started and is still running after the test
>
On Sa, Aug 18 2012, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 11:16 AM, Hauke Laging wrote:
>> Am Fr 17.08.2012, 09:56:56 schrieb auto15963931:
>>> or what key ID
>>> had been used in conjunction with that option? Thanks.
>>
>> You need the private recipient key in order to find out that key
>>
On Mo, Aug 20 2012, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:38:49 -0400 Jens Lechtenboerger
> wrote:
>
>> if a message M is encrypted to you and other
>>recipients using RSA, then you are of course able to obtain the
>>session key K. Now, if you suspect A
On Mo, Aug 20 2012, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:57:41 -0400 Jens Lechtenboerger
> wrote:
>
>>In contrast, I interpreted the original question in terms of
>>recipient anonymity: Bob wants to encrypt a message to some
>>undisclosed list of recip
On Mi, Sep 05 2012, notizblock wrote:
> Am 2012-09-05 09:39, schrieb antispa...@sent.at:
>
>> Could you recommend a safe text editor, in the sense it does protect the
>> edited contents in memory, but, most important, on the disk (temp files
>> and such). Having functions to interact with gnupg wo
On Di, Sep 11 2012, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> I think people want it because editing a text file *now* might
> expose the data *far into the future*. Temp files and swap pages
> have the potential to live on your hard disk for a very long time.
> [...]
> The only sure-fire remedy against a temp file
On Sa, Jun 29 2013, Pete Stephenson wrote:
> Ok, but isn't pcscd the scdaemon?
No. Actually, I don’t know anything about the Crypto Stick but I’m
using an OpenPGP smartcard. I don’t need pcscd at all. In fact, on
one of my machines pcscd was installed and interfered with scdaemon.
I wrote abou
On 2018-04-28, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> When verifying an S/MIME message gpgsm (I think) asks whether I
> ultimately trust some certificate authority to certify others and then
> asks me to verify that a displayed fingerprint belongs to the authority.
> How do I know? (So far I have pressed the "Can
24 matches
Mail list logo
