Hi,
the problem might be related to issue 1644
(http://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1644), my cert is part of the
DFN-PKI.
- Jan
On 2015-01-15 10:23, Jan Eden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently installed GnuPG 2.1 and successfully used gpgsm for about a
> week. This morning, signing messag
Hi,
I recently installed GnuPG 2.1 and successfully used gpgsm for about a
week. This morning, signing messages with mutt failed, and the signature
of received messages cannot be verified. Signing a test file reveals:
lbox:~ jan$ gpgsm --verbose --sign testfile.txt
gpgsm: certificate is not usabl
Hi,
using GnuPG 2.0.19 and pinentry 0.8.3, I cannot import certificates with
private keys. There seems to be a problem between gpg-agent and
pinentry (excerpt from gpg-agent.log):
gpg-agent[22502]: chan_8 -> GETINFO pid
gpg-agent[22502]: chan_8 <- D 22503
gpg-agent[22502]: chan_8 <- OK
gpg-agent[
Sounds like your MUA supports S/MIME, you need a X.509 cert instead of a PGP
keypair.
Kind regards,
Jan
On 29.05.2013, at 08:12, edgard devaux wrote:
> hello
> using Gnupg with linux debian 7.0 and gnome; i created a key pair.
> my e-mail client asks me a certificat for personal to sign , an
Sounds like your MUA supports S/MIME, you need a X.509 cert instead of a PGP
keypair.
Kind regards,
Jan
On 29.05.2013, at 08:12, edgard devaux wrote:
> hello
> using Gnupg with linux debian 7.0 and gnome; i created a key pair.
> my e-mail client asks me a certificat for personal to sign , an
by the FBI regarding some message
they sent).
On the other hand, ordinary people have adapted at remarkable speed to a
society which is much more complex and intellectualy demanding than 200
years ago. I would not underestimate the potential of the homo sapiens.
Kind regards,
Jan Eden
On Mon, J
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:06:59AM +, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
> On 08/14/2013 08:33 AM, Johan Wevers wrote:
> > On 14-08-2013 5:36, Foo Bar wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to create a domain key, which can be used for all
> >> emails in a particular domain. For example, if the key is for
> >> "
Hi,
I just configured WKD on my server, and
gpg -v --auto-key-locate clear,wkd,nodefault --locate-key u...@domain.com
works as expected for most of my uid/key combos, except for one address
(oldu...@domain.com) which is linked to both a current and a revoked
key. The output of the above command
Hi,
I just configured WKD on my server, and
gpg -v --auto-key-locate clear,wkd,nodefault --locate-key u...@domain.com
works as expected for most of my uid/key combos, except for one address
(oldu...@domain.com) which is linked to both a current and a revoked
key. The output of the above command
On 2022-06-08 22:51, Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On 8 Jun 2022, at 07:46, Jan Eden via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
> >
> > - Which WKD server hosts my expired/revoked key such that it takes
> > precedence
> > over my own WKD server at domain.com <ht
On 2022-06-09 11:37, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 09/06/2022 07:11, Jan Eden wrote:
> > PS. The key used to sign your message seems to be expired.
>
> That could be because you already had my key in your keyring and it
> wasn't recently (i.e. in the last 18 months) refr
On 2022-06-09 10:40, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 08:11, Jan Eden said:
>
> > Now I corrected the mistake, and all is well.
>
> I don't think this is your mistake. We need to do something about it.
> Tracked at https://dev.gnupg.org/T6023
>
> BTW,
On 2022-06-09 12:08, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 09/06/2022 11:50, Jan Eden wrote:
> > jan ~ % gpg --refresh-key 0xFB73E21AF1163937
> > gpg: refreshing 1 key from hkp://pgp.surf.nl
> > gpg: key FB73E21AF1163937: "Andrew Gallagher " not
> > changed
>
On 2022-06-09 21:40, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2022 17:38:04 CEST Mark via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > I just looked at what Kleopatra has it set for and it has it set for
> > hkp://keys.gnupg.net as well. I'm guessing that is no longer the best
> > choice?
>
> Kleopatra 3.1.21.2204
On 2022-06-09 22:13, Jan Eden via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
> On 2022-06-09 21:40, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2022 17:38:04 CEST Mark via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > > I just looked at what Kleopatra has it set for and it has it set for
> > > hkp://keys.g
On 2022-06-09 12:52, Jan Eden via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On 2022-06-09 10:40, Werner Koch wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 08:11, Jan Eden said:
> >
> > > Now I corrected the mistake, and all is well.
> >
> > I don't think this is your mistake. We need to do
Hi,
I just check for a list of ransomware filename patterns (e.g.
*.cryptotorlocker*).
Best regards,
Jan
On 2022-08-04 18:58, Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
> I apologize for this message that can be a bit off topic.
> (I am on Ubuntu 16.04)
>
> How can I find say encrypted fi
On 2022-08-09 22:23, Ángel wrote:
> On 2022-08-04 at 18:58 +0200, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > So is there any other way to run find and some other script to find
> > suspicious files? Google is not really helpful
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Uwe Brauer
>
> If you suffer a ransomware at
On 2022-12-01 17:42, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> Hi friends of GnuPG,
>
> seems to be a good time to start an official Mastodon account
> for GnuPG and related topics like Gpg4win and OpenPGP.
>
> At least for announcements and some interaction as the interest
> is growing for this decentral platfor
On 2023-01-05 13:51, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2023 02:50:25 CET Jackson Chen via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > i had enabled KeePassXC secret service integration (some free desktop
> > standard). when i use my secret GPG/PGP keys, i get prompted by KeePassXC
> > to unlock the databa
20 matches
Mail list logo
