On 06/30/2010 03:41 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 6/29/10 5:44 PM, Roscoe wrote:
>> I wouldn't have thought a GnuPG FUSE FS would be very hard.
Over the years, I found that a good sign of an expert is that he/she
knows which problems are not as easy as they may seem.
--
Eray
s
and that's it. Sure email is still relevant in the business world but
the future seems to have moved on. The original assessment that email
is a dying tech/past its peak is spot on.
--
Eray Aslan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnu
Hi,
How can I make sure that all the emails in my Sent folder are encrypted
and can't be read without my private key? In other words, I want my
email in my Sent folder to be encrypted even though the email sent on
the wire is plain text.
Encrypt to self option only works if I send an encrypted m
On Tue, December 5, 2006 9:03 pm, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Eray Aslan wrote:
>> How can I make sure that all the emails in my Sent folder are encrypted
>> and can't be read without my private key? In other words, I want my
>> email in my Sent folder to be encrypted eve
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Eray Aslan wrote:
>> Surely there must be a better way. These all require admin access
>> to the IMAP server. The software already does what I want some of
>> the time (when I send the recipient encrypted email). I just want
>> it to do it all
John Clizbe wrote:
[snip]
> There is no provision for processing a message on multiple paths and
> specifying
> separate handling on each path when sending, nor would it be reasonable to
> expect there to be.
Ahh, this is the problem.
> There are two RFEs filed in Bugzilla to allow the unencrypt
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Your best alternative at this point is to hire a professional
> information security consultant.
[snip]
I'll fight for the budget but it's not likely. Thanks anyway.
--
Eray
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
John Clizbe wrote:
> Eray Aslan wrote:
>> The servers in question already have encryption at the file system level
>> with cryptsetupLUKS for Linux and truecrypt for windows boxes. But the
>> trouble is these do not provide any defense against attacks through the
>>
On 17.05.2007 16:10, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
[...]
> When I did similar things the setup was as follows:
>
> * there is one well-guarded organization key (org key)
> * every person involved has a key signed by the org key
> * people keys have designated-revoker set to org key
> * all OpenPGP s