n HTTPS
download or a Signed Windows .EXE available, so that users can have
confidence in what is downloaded from the GnuPG project?
Regards,
Doug Bateman
P.S. Please CC: me on the reply if possible.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi all,
I've been fairly quite after the original post, as I'm out of the country
for the next week. But I do want to reply (and hope to give a better reply
once I'm back home). I do agree that sophisticated Man in the Middle
attacks are hard to do. And I'm well aware of the idea that PGP stood
st, freedom, and hope. And I want everyone to have
access to that, even the PC users.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Doug Bateman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been fairly quite after the original post, as I'm out of the country
> for the next week. But I do want to reply (and
Here's an interesting question why does GnuPG.org bother providing a GPG
signature with it's downloaded files?
I can guess at several possible reasons other than MitM attacks: (a) To
allow users to ensure mirrored copies are legit, (b) To safeguard against
tampering with the file on the downlo
join Facebook by Doug Bateman. If you do not wish to receive
this type of email from Facebook in the future, please click on the link below
to unsubscribe.
http://www.facebook.com/o.php?k=75ee67&u=684792329&mid=19c91edG28d11a09G0G8
Facebook's offices are located at 1601 S. Califor
