On 2021-01-09 at 23:40 +0100, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Well, I wish Werner would chime in, because what I really don't
> understand why do we have two options, instead of one and why is the
> advanced method the first one to be checked, if we have as first one
> the direct method, whic
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 6:01 PM Ángel wrote:
> sequoia is in the wrong here. You don't have a valid SSL cert for
> openpgpkey.sac001.github.io Either they are not supporting the advanced
> method (maybe they follow an older draft?) or they ignore the
> certificate failure (which would be quite ba
On 2021-01-10 at 18:47 +0100, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Can you tell me/us in laymen terms how this works with gnupg.org?
>
> openpgpkey.gnupg.org has address 217.69.77.222
> openpgpkey.gnupg.org has IPv6 address 2001:aa8:fff1:100::22
>
> Regards
> Stefan
Sure. Let's suppose you want
