Hi Stefan,
On Fri, 08 Jan 2021 23:05:52 +0100,
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:21 PM Stefan Claas
> wrote:
>
> > I guess the only way to fix it (for many people) would be
> > that, as of my understanding (now) the WKD check
> > and SSL cert check would be a bit mo
Hi all,
if a user A has a secret (signing/certification) key K and two e-mail
adresses A1 and A2, the OpenPGP key consists of the following packets:
* public key K packet
* user ID A1 packet
* signature packet over K and A1 signed with K
* user ID A2 packet
* signature packet over K and
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 11:37 AM Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> It appears that gpg is trying the advanced lookup method, gets an
> error, and then doesn't fallback to the direct lookup method. This is
> consistent with the I-D:
>
>3.1. Key Discovery
>
>...
>
>There are two variants on ho
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 2:37 PM Stefan Claas
wrote:
> Hi Neal,
>
> thanks for the reply, much appreciated! Simply said, for the average
> user like me, I believe GitHub is doing it right, because it is a
> valid option according to their SSL cert data, and Werner simply
> overlooked this option. I
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 11:34 PM Stefan Claas
wrote:
> But (sorry to say this here on the GnuPG ML) good news is
> I just tested it with an older version of sequoia-pgp and guess
> what it works for me. :-)
>
> sq wkd get ste...@sac001.github.io
> -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
> Comment: 37
On Samstag, 9. Januar 2021 15:43:14 CET Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 2:37 PM Stefan Claas
> wrote:
> > Hi Neal,
> >
> > thanks for the reply, much appreciated! Simply said, for the average
> > user like me, I believe GitHub is doing it right, because it is a
> > va
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 7:27 PM Ingo Klöcker wrote:
>
> On Samstag, 9. Januar 2021 15:43:14 CET Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > Example: If I would be the host master of the domain bund.de with it's
> > many subdomains and authorities would request that WKD, as an
> > inexpensive inhouse o
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 8:08 PM Stefan Claas
wrote:
> host sac001.github.io
> sac001.github.io has address 185.199.111.153
> sac001.github.io has address 185.199.109.153
> sac001.github.io has address 185.199.110.153
> sac001.github.io has address 185.199.108.153
>
> works as well and why can sequ
On 2021-01-09 at 11:44 +0100, Annie Yousar via Gnupg-users wrote:
> How to create a signature packet over K, A1 and E1 signed with K in
> GnuPG?
Hello Ann
The best way would probably be to use two pgp keys: (K1, A1, E1) and
(K2, A2, E2)
You could have two keys (K, A1, E1) and (K, A2, E2) and sel
On Samstag, 9. Januar 2021 20:50:54 CET Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 8:08 PM Stefan Claas
> wrote:
> > host sac001.github.io
> > sac001.github.io has address 185.199.111.153
> > sac001.github.io has address 185.199.109.153
> > sac001.github.io has address 185.199.11
On 2021-01-09 at 14:37 +0100, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> I believe GitHub is doing it right, because it is a
> valid option according to their SSL cert data, and Werner simply
> overlooked this option.
It is not. A certificate for *.github.io doesn't cover
openpgpkey.sac001.github.io
S
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 11:09 PM Ingo Klöcker wrote:
>
> On Samstag, 9. Januar 2021 20:50:54 CET Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 8:08 PM Stefan Claas
> > wrote:
> > > host sac001.github.io
> > > sac001.github.io has address 185.199.111.153
> > > sac001.github.io has
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 11:42 PM Ángel wrote:
>
> On 2021-01-09 at 14:37 +0100, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > I believe GitHub is doing it right, because it is a
> > valid option according to their SSL cert data, and Werner simply
> > overlooked this option.
>
> It is not. A certificate f
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 11:49 PM Stefan Claas
wrote:
> Like I said in my previous reply to Ingo, It would be nice if GitHub staff
> would
> see this thread and talk with Werner.
Well, I just wrote GitHub support and asked if their staff can check
this thread,
which I linked to in my message.
Le
14 matches
Mail list logo
