Mark wrote:
> Thanks I may take a look at it and just see what it does. I'm still
> VERY much a novice in regards to all this so just trying to learn
> more. My "experiment" with Kleopatra was just to see if I could since
> it said "optional" for the name part.
>
> Sorry, not sure who dkg is bu
On Fri, 22 May 2020 03:18, Ángel said:
> how this AF_UNIX socket is actually implemented on Gpg4win (as a named
> pipe, perhaps?), but your issues might be related to having it on a
It is a regular file with a nonce and a port. The server listens on
localhost:THATPORT for connections and checks
On Wed, 20 May 2020 18:06, MFPA said:
> Does (or will) --include-key-block have an argument that can be set to
> tell it to only include ECC keyblocks, or to set a maximum keyblock
No, it is better to let the caller (ee.g. the MUA) pass this option than
to have it in a config file. (I initially
On Wed, 20 May 2020 19:11, Stefan Claas said:
> Curious as I am, did Mr Schönbohm never asked you why your public
> keyblock is not signed by Governikus?
I don't know a Mr. Schönbohm. I know Governikus and recently noticed
that their software does not even support the recommended set of
algorith
On Wed, 20 May 2020 15:16, Mark said:
> It must be... With all the talk of "anonymous" keys I wanted to see if I
> could create one with Kleopatra, especially since it says optional for
> name.
The name should indeed be optiona; If that has not been fixed in the
latest version, please file a bug.
On Freitag, 22. Mai 2020 10:48:55 CEST Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 2020 03:18, Ángel said:
> > how this AF_UNIX socket is actually implemented on Gpg4win (as a named
> > pipe, perhaps?), but your issues might be related to having it on a
>
> It is a regular file with a nonc
Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 20 May 2020 19:11, Stefan Claas said:
>
> > Curious as I am, did Mr Schönbohm never asked you why your public
> > keyblock is not signed by Governikus?
>
> I don't know a Mr. Schönbohm. I know Governikus and recently noticed
> that their software does not even supp
> dkg stands for Daniel Kahn Gillmor. He is a highly respected member
> in the GnuPG/OpenPGP scene and maintains GnuPG for the Linux Debian
> OS.
He would prefer you refer to Debian as the GNU/Linux Debian OS. :)
dkg is also a genuinely pleasant person. I've met him a couple of times
at confere
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 22 May 2020 at 9:52:35 AM, in
, Werner Koch wrote:-
> No, it is better to let the caller (ee.g. the MUA)
> pass this option
How would it be used only with ECC keys? The MUA doesn't know the
flavour of key/subkey.
- --
Best regards
It is installed on the local file system of one of our internal servers, a
portion of which is shared on our internal network. The server is running
Windows Server 2016, and all of the clients that can access it are running
Windows 10 or Windows Server 2012 R2 or higher.
FWIW, GnuPG 1.x (latest
Robert,
Hi and thanks for the reply. Salsa is cooking. And since you
are so kind:
It would help a whole lot if GPG included some authoritative
documentation on how to use the program in the following scenario:
- The trust in the correspondent's public key is established only
by comparing the ke
11 matches
Mail list logo
