Decryption fails with "No secret key"

2020-01-03 Thread Gabriele Pohl
Hi After upgrading my PC to Fedora 30 gnupg2-2.2.17-1.fc30.x86_64 gnupg2-smime-2.2.17-1.fc30.x86_64 gpgme-1.12.0-1.fc30.x86_64 gnutls-3.6.10-1.fc30.x86_64 libgcrypt-1.8.5-1.fc30.x86_64 libgpg-error-1.33-2.fc30.x86_64 a problem with decrypting came up. Encryption works: $ gpg --verbose --outpu

New OpenPGP packet request

2020-01-03 Thread Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users
Hi Werner and all GnuPG hackers, I would like to ask if it is possible in a future version of GnuPG to have a new OpenPGP packet defined, which would allow GnuPG users that their public key can be no longer uploaded to the the old SKS keyserver Network, so that SKS rejects the OpenPGP Public Key B

master key certify capability

2020-01-03 Thread john doe
Hi, I use the following command to test my new key setup: $ gpg --batch --passphrase '' --yes --quick-gen 'Firstname Lastname ' rsa4096 cert 1d&& for u in sign sign encrypt; do gpg --batch --passphrase '' --yes --quick-add-key $(gpg --with-colons -k test | awk -F: 'NR==3{print substr($2,1

Re: New OpenPGP packet request

2020-01-03 Thread Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote: > It is assumed that the SKS Network will not go away in the near > future and it is assumed once such a new non-compatible SKS packet > would be supported by GnuPG it could be quickly supported by modern > Hagrid, Mailvelope and hockeypuck. Mmmh, while thinkin

Re: master key certify capability

2020-01-03 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 07:06:42PM +0100, john doe wrote: > $ gpg -K > > - > sec rsa4096 2020-01-03 [C] [expires: 2020-01-04] > 3C5CFD620005347A62052A6B596CB80D30E8829D > uid [ultimate] Firstname Lastname > ssb rsa4096 2020-01-03 [S] [expires: 2020-

Re: New OpenPGP packet request

2020-01-03 Thread Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote: > Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote: > > > It is assumed that the SKS Network will not go away in the near > > future and it is assumed once such a new non-compatible SKS packet > > would be supported by GnuPG it could be quickly supported by modern > > Hagrid