On 14.09.2019 13:15, Binarus wrote:
> I have used the Thunderbird / Enigmail / Gpg4Win troika for quite a
> while without any issue. Yesterday, I had to reinstall, and while doing
> so, upgraded to the newest versions of that packages, and while I was at
> it, revoked my old (1024-bit) keys and gen
Hi
Since I know that the keyserver maintainers follow this list, I wonder what
happened to 37.191.231.105, which is part of the keyserver pool?
It currently HTTP-301-redirects to https://analytics.sumptuouscapital.com/ -
which also means that requests to URLs like http://keys.gnupg.net will some
Hi all
Some years ago I used GnuPG, but somewhen stopped with it.
Now I want to start again. However there are many rumors that it is
unsecure meanwhile.
I need recommendations:
- Which version of software shall I install?
- Create key via cli-commands or is Windows-Version ok?
- Which keys s
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019, Binarus wrote:
> Surname, Forename | Company
> Commas are not allowed as part of email addresses. While I knew that, I
unless quoted, e.g.,
"Surname, Forename | Company"
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:29:19AM +0200, Daniel Bossert wrote:
I need recommendations:
- Which version of software shall I install?
The latest version available for your system, which should in any case
be a version from the 2.2 branch. (If your system is Windows, that would
be Gpg4Win
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:11, io...@ionic.de said:
> which also means that requests to URLs like http://keys.gnupg.net will
> sometimes
> redirect a user to that location.
That is not correct. For quite some time that address is a hardwired to
avoid problems DNS problems (https://dev.gnupg.org/T37
* On 9/15/19 3:56 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> The trust packets are for internal use of gpg and are never exported.
But... that's the whole point. gpg 1.4 seems to export them, while gpg 2.x does
not.
> These packets are one of the reasons why we stated for decades that the
> interface is "gpg --
* On 9/16/19 3:27 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:11, io...@ionic.de said:
>
>> which also means that requests to URLs like http://keys.gnupg.net will
>> sometimes
>> redirect a user to that location.
>
> That is not correct. For quite some time that address is a hardwired to
>
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:41, io...@ionic.de said:
> * On 9/15/19 3:56 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
>> The trust packets are for internal use of gpg and are never exported.
>
> But... that's the whole point. gpg 1.4 seems to export them, while gpg
> 2.x does not.
I just checked the code and I can't see how
Daniel Bossert wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Some years ago I used GnuPG, but somewhen stopped with it.
>
> Now I want to start again. However there are many rumors that it is
> unsecure meanwhile.
Can you tell us what rumors you have heared? I would say the encryption
in GnuPG is secure, but sadly peop
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:49, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
> speak, with a specially crafted software, when using an online computer
> with a SmardCard? I have read that the secret key can not been copied from
> the card, but what about the 'bits and pieces' in memory when decrypting?
Side-channel at
11 matches
Mail list logo
