I don't know how this came to pass, but:
PS C:\Users\Robert J. Hansen\Documents> gpg --list-keys 12d9199d7b3b7495
pub dsa2048/12D9199D7B3B7495 2017-07-26 [SCA]
1BE9AAB825A55E48195F1A0312D9199D7B3B7495
uid [ unknown] Tobias Schultz
sub elg2048/B57E2F27C75F8668 2017-07-26
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 21:04, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
> I'd like to open a discussion about removing this option.
Please not again. That whole largeRSA key mess was a compromise to
silence a very few individuals who had, well, interesting ideas on
required key sizes. Sometimes it is easier to a
On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 19:18, tim@gmx.net said:
> this 1024 key has a 8192 sub key what is te meaning of such a large sub key?
It means that a user of that key has a way to identify that subkey by
means outside of gpg. That user and the holder of that key also have
verified every bit of the sour
> That whole largeRSA key mess was a compromise to silence a very few
> individuals who had, well, interesting ideas on required key sizes.
As always, the needs of real users are paramount. If there are real
users who will be impacted, that's all the justification needed.
Consider my request wit
Il 03/10/2017 12:40, Werner Koch ha scritto:
[...]
> scrutinized the Intel ME, fixed all bugs in gpg, live in tempest
At least they should have shared the bugfixes! :)
BYtE,
Diego
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.o
