On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:07, r...@splintermail.com said:
> gpg --export --armored some_key_id > keyfile
(Please try to use the fingerprint instead of the key_id.)
> But then I wanted perform some basic checks on the file submitted, and I
> found this fantastic behavior:
>
> cat keyfile | gpg
>Such a thing already exists, at least here in Italy: CIE/CNS. X509-based certs.
exactly, this is what started the idea; we have no power over those
certificate for revoke, and i have no idea if a new certificate is
issued if you loose your document.
What I found out is that the CA seems to be re
>Until and unless you present a usability study involving 100+ people composing
>a representative sample of an identifiable community, you don't know a thing.
* I think * is NOT * I know *. I may be wrong: I don't care. First of
all i want to implement this for myself, and if i'm right and is
som
>> Your "average internet user" is a 1940s-style way of thinking. We need to do
>> better than that.
>
> Then explain FB, google, youtube, amazon... all of them does NOT
> provide a great deal of personalization, if at all.
They all provide intensely personalized experiences. Just because they
Philip Jackson wrote:
> I have the log file which I attach.
>
> It shows a number of reports of the same error (lines 89,91,97,99,101)
> ERR 83886254 Unknown option , before it asks me for the pin
> (line 111). It says 'confidential data not shown' three times but I only
> entered the pin once.
