On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 21:10, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
> I use S/MIME literally daily at work. My co-workers like S/MIME because it's
> close to an "it just works" solution. Few of my co-workers have been willing
> to learn GnuPG.
You mean GPG. GnuPG includes GPG and GPGSM and thus support fo
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 01:02, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
> how to talk to gpg-agent for use of secret keys. That way gpg-agent
> could delegate the work to the smartcard via scdaemon, and OpenPGP.js
> wouldn't need to know anything about the secret key material.
It might be worth to look at Nativ
On 11/09/16 02:13, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Whichever "they" you had in mind when you brought it up...? ;-)
>
> I said "Enigmail and other clients" -- if you don't specify which
> precise implementation you're interested in, I don't know which one you
> want to know about.
Well, I sort of wante
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 03:10:24PM -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > I understand what S/MIME is and that it's probably the easiest crypto
> > solution for most email users. But why would someone comfortable with
> > GnuPG use it?
>
> There's a subtle point here. The question isn't whether you'r
I recently decided to change my default smartcard on one machine
because it was easier to use and carry a flat card than one in a USB
reader, and that particular machine has a smartcard slot. I had two
smartcards anyway for testing purposes.
I thought it would be a simple matter of deleting the ke
using claws-mail on a Windows 10 Pro / 64 bit machine, I see the
following error message appear quite often on the bottom of the screen:
The signature can't be checked - Unsupported protocol
I don't understand the reason for this or how to correct it. Can anyone
assist me?
--
Jerry
___
On 12.09.2016 21:15, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> Assuming everyone is willing and comfortable with using GnuPG, is there
> any compelling reason (aside from easy setup and use) to use S/MIME?
The main reason I can think of is the fact that there are mail clients
that don't support PGP without sign
> You mean GPG. GnuPG includes GPG and GPGSM and thus support for OpenPGP
> and for S/MIME.
No, they refuse to learn GnuPG. If S/MIME was provided by GPGSM they'd
refuse to use S/MIME -- they want something that "just works," not
something they have to install and fiddle with.
_
Hi,
I'm new to the list, so a "Hello" to all! ;)
I'm trying to look up public OpenPGP-keys published via DNSSEC (IETF RFC
7929) using the command 'gpg2 --auto-key-locate dane --search-keys
i...@mail.de' on Ubuntu 16.04 (GnuPG version 2.1.11).
gpg2 always returns:
gpg: no keyserver known (use op
Hi,
I'm new to the list, so a "Hello" to all! ;)
I'm trying to look up public OpenPGP-keys published via DNSSEC (IETF RFC
7929) using the command 'gpg2 --auto-key-locate dane --search-keys
i...@mail.de' on Ubuntu 16.04 (GnuPG version 2.1.11).
gpg2 always returns:
gpg: no keyserver known (use op
Hi,
On 09/12/2016 11:54 PM, Rene "Renne" Bartsch, B.Sc. Informatics wrote:
I'm trying to look up public OpenPGP-keys published via DNSSEC (IETF RFC
7929) using the command 'gpg2 --auto-key-locate dane --search-keys
i...@mail.de'
What's wrong with my command or gpg2?
I think the --search-keys
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:54, je...@seibercom.net said:
> using claws-mail on a Windows 10 Pro / 64 bit machine, I see the
> following error message appear quite often on the bottom of the screen:
>
> The signature can't be checked - Unsupported protocol
Did you load all the OpenPGP and the S/MIME pl
On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 23:54, r...@bartschnet.de said:
> I'm trying to look up public OpenPGP-keys published via DNSSEC (IETF RFC
> 7929) using the command 'gpg2 --auto-key-locate dane --search-keys
> i...@mail.de' on Ubuntu 16.04 (GnuPG version 2.1.11).
The command --search-keys is keyserver specif
On 13/09/16 15:33, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:02, andr...@andrewg.com said:
>
>> 1. Why was the A keystub not deleted and regenerated when I did gpg
>> --delete-secret-keys; gpg --card-status, like the E and S ones
>> apparently were?
>
> Did you get a pinentry prompt to confirm
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:02, andr...@andrewg.com said:
> 1. Why was the A keystub not deleted and regenerated when I did gpg
> --delete-secret-keys; gpg --card-status, like the E and S ones
> apparently were?
Did you get a pinentry prompt to confirm the deletion of the secret key
(actually two prom
Dear Damien
Thank you greatly for your quick response and helpful information. This is very
good news.
Setting up the reader for a normal user should be fairly straightforward using
a udev rule, so thank you for the reminder.
Cheers,
Scott
Sent via Mutt from my Ubuntu Server.
Damien Goutte
Hi
I am a little confused with the many gpp's options and need advice.
I want to export files to public servers, keeping them with encryption confidential to any individual outside of a given set of people. These documents have to be accessible to groups of correspondants. I intend to defi
Hi,
On 09/13/2016 04:42 PM, Daniel Haskin wrote:
My question is, can GPG serve up both?
Yes.
I don't think it's possible to turn the SSH key I was given into a
GPG key
You don't need to do that. Just load the key into the agent using the
ssh-add tool, as you would do if you were using th
Long-time GPG user here, thanks so much for everyone's help and work on it.
I really like the feature GPG 2.1 has, where it can serve up a subkey of a
private key to SSH and act as an SSH agent. I use a particular subkey of my
master key for SSH authentication and I really like it.
But, at
19 matches
Mail list logo
