The world would be a much better place if we could ban signatures and
non pure-text emails. Alas...
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> But so too are the privacy absolutists who believe that law-enforcement
> is doing something morally wrong when they try to break Tor's anonymity
> in the pursuit of awful people.
I think you can say this sentence with the one that try br
Paolo Bolzoni wrote:
> The world would be a much better place if we could ban signatures and
> non pure-text emails. Alas...
The Net thrives on incompetence :-( UUCP '%' & '!' once excluded zombies.
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich
Reply below, Prefix '>
> Paolo Bolzoni wrote:
>> The world would be a much better place if we could ban signatures and
>> non pure-text emails. Alas...
The world is a better place for it neither banning, nor trying to ban,
such things.
First, how do you ban signatures without banning people? Many people
work in busine
(1) and (2) Did you read the word "alas"? Of course it's not
possible. Secondly the fact business policy mandates something does
not make it a good idea, in this case it does not at all.
(3) Study the meaning of the word "Encoding." Plain-text has nothing
to do with what characters you can repres
On 26 Aug 2016, at 15:39, Paolo Bolzoni wrote:
> just write a .pdf
It's a sad day when pdf is considered preferable to html... ;-)
A
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
