> ("privacy absolutist" is political framing 101 -- would you
> feel fairly treated if I described your views on the matter as, say,
> "government absolutist"?)
I'd shrug and point to my many public statements where I've supported
strong, non-backdoored privacy tools. If someone wants to accuse m
On 24-08-2016 4:26, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> 1. Are you a privacy absolutist?
Yes.
> 2. If yes, why should we listen to you?
The child porn excuse is used too often. The terrorism card is also
played often (not that it would help much against that as all known
exmples show). And
On 24-08-2016 8:41, Werner Koch wrote:
> Whether the current German rules on when and how constitutional rights
> on privacy can lawfully be suspended are still in compliance with the
> constitution is a different question.
They can try the French method: declare the state of emergency after
some
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:42:34AM -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I'd shrug and point to my many public statements where I've supported
> strong, non-backdoored privacy tools. If someone wants to accuse me of
> being a government absolutist, that's on them.
Then let me ask you how "I have suppo
Lynda Harlos
Home based travel agent
Orion Travelinx
Home office: 905-433-4267
Text: 905-723-9210
www.facebook.com/TravelAgent.LyndaHarlos
Referrals are the best compliment!
Any price/s quoted not guaranteed until payment is made
To unsubscribe please reply with unsubscribe in su
Il 24/08/2016 14:11, Francesco Ariis ha scritto:
> @Johan Wevers: you might or might not be aware, but what you describe
> is the "Four Horseman of the Infocalypse" [1].
Instead of stupid backdoors, couldn't legislators simply say that if
encryption is used to try to hide a crime (that still have
>> 1. Are you a privacy absolutist?
>
> Yes.
Thank you for being clear on that.
>> 2. If yes, why should we listen to you?
>
> The child porn excuse is used too often...
But this doesn't answer my question.
Why should we listen to a privacy absolutist?
> You can try - someone mig
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:17:19AM -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > You can try - someone might have used a weak password, wrote it down
> > somewhere or made another mistake. Or can be pressured into telling it
> > (the famous $5 wrench comes to mind here).
>
> Wait, wait, wait.
>
> You're opp
> Then let me ask you how "I have supported strong, non-backdoored
> privacy tools" doesn't clash with:
>
>>3. If no, then how should we permit privacy tools to be
>>circumvented?
Simple: I wasn't presenting my own views, I was asking Johan for his.
Where's the contradiction?
__
On 24-08-2016 15:17, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>>> 2. If yes, why should we listen to you?
>>
>> The child porn excuse is used too often...
>
> But this doesn't answer my question.
>
> Why should we listen to a privacy absolutist?
Why would we listen to anyone for that matter?
>> You can tr
> He is of course not advocating torture, he's merely listing possible
> exploits, referencing to xkcd #538.
My question was, "How should we permit privacy tools to be
circumvented?" His answer was, "You can try - someone might have used a
weak password, wrote it down somewhere or made another mi
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:41:33AM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:37, joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl said:
>
> > (German), the German and French government are attacking the right to
> > encrypt communication of their serfs. Also because of their violent
>
> Despite their common decl
> Why would we listen to anyone for that matter?
Ideally, because they present options that may work better than what we
currently have. Privacy absolutism -- the position that there is *no*
justification for infringing on individual privacy, even in the case of
serious crimes -- doesn't offer an
> P.S. We may be in the Second Crypto Wars, but the genie is out of the
> bottle, so that sense of "oh noes, the governments is coming for
> my cryptoes" just isn't there so much.
Yeah, which is why I find both sides of the privacy absolutist debate to
be ... pretty much comically mis
Can we refrain from people marketing on this forum , I guess this is not a
marketing forum , and these need to be blocked
Sunny
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 07:37, "lynda.har...@sympatico.ca"
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Lynda Harlos
> Home based travel agent
> Orion Travelinx
> Home office: 90
On 24/08/16 15:37, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I find the current state of detente to be pretty good, actually. We're
> allowed to design the best systems we can, and governments are allowed
> to discover where we're not as clever as we think we are. If there's a
> flaw in Tor and the FBI uses it t
I have contacted you several times to unsubscribe me please.
Lynda Harlos
Home based travel agent
Orion Travelinx
Home office: 905-433-4267
Text: 905-723-9210
www.facebook.com/TravelAgent.LyndaHarlos
Referrals are the best compliment!
Any price/s quoted not guaranteed until pay
On 24/08/16 18:44, lynda.har...@sympatico.ca wrote:
> I have contacted you several times to unsubscribe me please.
Yet, the "you" you are contacting are not in the power to help you. It would be
strange if the subscribers of a public mailing list could unsubscribe other
subscribers.
Please foll
>> 3. If no, then how should we permit privacy tools to be
>> circumvented?
>
> Do you honestly believe that this is really possible? That government
> backdoor will stay available only to government and will not be
> misused?
I never said I believed backdoors were an appropriate way to circu
On , Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> 3. If no, then how should we permit privacy tools to be
> circumvented?
Do you honestly believe that this is really possible? That government
backdoor will stay available only to government and will not be
misused?
As an example I would raise issue of TSA accep
On , Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> >> 3. If no, then how should we permit privacy tools to be
> >> circumvented?
> >
> > Do you honestly believe that this is really possible? That government
> > backdoor will stay available only to government and will not be
> > misused?
>
> I never said I believ
you have to unsubscribe yourself. the link to do so is at the bottom of
every email from the list
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 12:44 -0400, lynda.har...@sympatico.ca wrote:
>
> I have contacted you several times to unsubscribe me please.
>
>
>
>
>
> Lynda Harlos
> Home based travel a
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:37:35AM -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>>
>> P.S. We may be in the Second Crypto Wars, but the genie is out of
>> the bottle, so that sense of "oh noes, the governments is
>> coming for my cryptoes" just isn't there so much.
>
> Yeah, which is why I find bot
Hi Lynda,
Unfortunately, that's not how it works. Essentially all of us are just
users and can't unsubscribe you. Instead, your message was sent to the
entire mailing list.
Thankfully, the self-service process is straightforward: if you wish to
unsubscribe, just click the link at the bottom of ev
On 24-08-2016 16:27, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Ideally, because they present options that may work better than what we
> currently have. Privacy absolutism -- the position that there is *no*
> justification for infringing on individual privacy, even in the case of
> serious crimes -- doesn't offe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I just realized that OpenPGP.conf is coming up in less than a month.
Unfortunately, I won't be able to attend. Will anyone be streaming it
live? If not, will there be videos posted?
Thanks,
Anthony
- --
OpenPGP Key:4096R/0x028ADF7453B04B15
Oth
Hi,
Sorry it took so long to get back to you on this. Today I installed gpg
2.1.15, which contains your fix. I haven’t seen SSH connections hang yet, but
haven’t been using it long.
I did, however, see failure to use the card. I initiated an SSH session, and
it immediately prompted for the
this woman is not marketing, she is asking to be taken off the mailing list
and simply happens to have a signature with her business information on it.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 6:42 AM, SUNNY <4got2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can we refrain from people marketing on this forum , I guess this is not a
>
28 matches
Mail list logo
