Hi all,
In July when I've created my Master Key, I didn't use --expert option
and now my master key is Cert and Sign and got 2 subkey for encryption
(+1 revoke).
pub 4096R/0882B381 créé : 2015-07-04 expire : jamais utilisation : SC
confiance : ultimevalidité : ulti
Hi,
I've been having some problems using a GPG card 2.1 with Ubuntu repo GPG,
think it was 2.0.22.
I noticed some discussions in Sept-15 about this and got the impression
that it should work.
Can someone just make a short comment on this, should a 2.0.22 be able to
generate 4096 keys and/or impo
On 01/25/2016 06:46 PM, Jorgen Ottosson wrote:
> I noticed some discussions in Sept-15 about this and got the impression
> that it should work.
>
> Can someone just make a short comment on this, should a 2.0.22 be able to
> generate 4096 keys and/or import 4096 subkeys from keyring?
>
> The card
On 25.01.2016 12:08, Antoine Michard wrote:
> It's work well except that for https://encrypt.to, he use my first
> encryption key and I can't decrypt it with my Smartcard.
I'd report an issue to encrypt.to maintainer.
encrypt.to also doesn't handle correctly the case when more than one key
matches
On 25/01/16 10:08, Antoine Michard wrote:
>
> So I thinking what is the best to do next:
> - Delete my useless first subkey encryption from my keyring and send
> update to key server.
Once you've published a subkey it stays published. Deleting a previously
published subkey only removes it from yo
On Mon 2016-01-25 05:08:31 -0500, Antoine Michard wrote:
> So I thinking what is the best to do next:
> - Delete my useless first subkey encryption from my keyring and send
> update to key server.
If you don't want people to encrypt messages to your D693C37C subkey,
you should revoke that subkey (
>> It's work well except that for https://encrypt.to, he use my first
>> encryption key and I can't decrypt it with my Smartcard.
>
> I'd report an issue to encrypt.to maintainer.
> encrypt.to also doesn't handle correctly the case when more than one key
> matches speceificed short key id, e.g. htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/25/2016 02:55 PM, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 25/01/16 10:08, Antoine Michard wrote:
>>
>> So I thinking what is the best to do next: - Delete my useless
>> first subkey encryption from my keyring and send update to key
>> server.
>
> Once y
On 25 Jan 2016, at 14:50, Antoine Michard wrote:
> Thx Again Andrew. You are an incredible source of GPG knowledge
I'm really not. Just trying to be helpful. Don't trust me any more than any
other random person on the Internet. I'm quite likely to make a mistake or
leave out something importa
On 25 Jan 2016 at 21:07, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> However, please note that many card readers have problems with larger
> APDU. Generating keys on card should be ok, but importing keys would
> be failed with bad reader. Signing should be ok, but decryption would
> be failed with bad reader. That's
On 01/26/2016 08:18 AM, Jorgen Ottosson wrote:
> Can't really confirm that here, generating seem not to work either.
>
> gpg --card-status
Please note that GnuPG 1.4 supports up to 3072-bit. This is because
of internal library limitation.
I believe that "gpg" in Ubuntu is GnuPG 1.4. It is "gpg
Hi,
some ways to achieve what you pretend,
# sign (effectively)
gpg2 --edit-key [name or email address or short/long keyID or, better,
fingerprint of your contact]
gpg> sign -u [your non-primary uid for signing given as name or email
address]
# sign only locally, i.e. it does not leave your com
I downloaded gnupg-2.0.29.tar.bz2 and libgpg-error-1.21.tar.bz2 and
their corresponding .sig files from www.gnupg.org/download.
I tried to verify them using the gnupg (version 1.4.16) that came with
my Ubuntu 14.04 distribution and got bad signature messages for both files:
$ gpg --verify gnupg
13 matches
Mail list logo
