Smells like something to do with IPv6
On 14 May 2015 at 12:41, Daniel Bomar wrote:
> I'm using Arch Linux and running a custom kernel (version 4.0.2) and
> I'm unable to use the --refresh-keys function. I know the kernel is
> the problem because when I reboot into the ARCH distribution kernel
>
Hi,
On my system both gnupg 1.4.19 and 2.1.2 are installed. I'm still
trying to track down what needs what.
gnupg2 seems to have attempted to automatically migrate my DB from an
older version to a newer version on first execution. However, it
seems to have failed:
gpg: starting migration from
Hello!
Is it possible to connect to the ldap server by TLS(ldaps).
--
Best Regards!
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hello,
maybe I’m blind, but how can I receive a key from a pka- or
OpenPGP-DNS-entry without encrypting a (dummy-)file?
Sincerely,
DaB.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hello everyone,
I am finally planning on leaving the nickname I choose as a kid for my email.
So I bough the palhares.me domain (my last name) and I will be setting Postfix
for that email alfr...@palhares.me, with that, I want to have the best possible
GPG Keypair.
I've been doing some reading[1
Looks to be the case. The strange thing is I thought that as well and
tested by passing "ipv6.disable=1" to my distribution kernel and it
still worked. Then I compiled IPV6 support into my custom kernel and
that got it working BUT when I pass "ipv6.disable=1" to my custom
kernel it does NOT work.
On Thursday, May 14, 2015 05:04:39 PM Alfredo Palhares wrote:
Password Store allows you to encrypt your entire tree of keys with multiple
keys so for #2, you shouldn't have a problem. As for storing keys offline, in
the case of having a backup, storing your private keys to a physical medium or
On 05/14/2015 06:04 PM, Alfredo Palhares wrote:
I've been doing some reading[1]
I would note that this document is obsolete on several points.
* First and foremost, it suggests using GnuPG 1.4. Even in 2013, there
were already no reason to prefer that version over GnuPG 2.0; a fortiori
there
Alfredo Palhares:
> - I use a password manager[3] to store my passwords and share them across
> devices, since they would be to separate keys, I would need to encrypt for
> to
> separate key IDs right ?
>
I don't understand what you are trying to say here.
Alfredo Palhares:
> - How do you s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wednesday 13 May 2015 at 1:29:51 AM, in
, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> The message "unknown" is new in 2.1.4.
> These options have been unknown for GnuPG 2.1. The
> change makes inform users about these unknown options:
> http://git.gnupg.org/cgi
10 matches
Mail list logo