On Sun, 3 May 2015 01:02, diaf...@gmail.com said:
> I've been playing around with key signatures and ran across an interesting
> situation. For some reason, --with-sig-check is silently ignored when used
> with
> --import and --recv-keys. Is this something I should file a bug on?
It has no func
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 2 May 2015 at 3:36:47 AM, in
, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> I think this is the crux of your issue. It sounds like
> a bug to me.
> I've opened a bug report about it:
> https://bugs.gnupg.org/gnupg/issue1967
Do you think a notifi
On Sat, 2 May 2015 18:29, m...@monaco.cx said:
> smartcard. This doesn't appear to be the case, however I may have broken it by
> getting fancy: I moved my .key files to -CAPS-8charkeyid-comment
> (e.g. rsa2048-E-DDEC74FE-revoked) and then symlinked .key.
Better don't do that. That may break on
On 05/03/2015 01:16 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sun 2015-05-03 06:35:37 -0400, MFPA wrote:
>> On Saturday 2 May 2015 at 3:36:47 AM, in
>> , Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>
>>> https://bugs.gnupg.org/gnupg/issue1967
>>
>> Do you think a notification should be displayed, something like
>> "Si
On 05/03/2015 09:29 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sat, 2 May 2015 18:29, m...@monaco.cx said:
>
>> smartcard. This doesn't appear to be the case, however I may have broken it
>> by
>> getting fancy: I moved my .key files to -CAPS-8charkeyid-comment
>> (e.g. rsa2048-E-DDEC74FE-revoked) and then sym
On Sun 2015-05-03 06:35:37 -0400, MFPA wrote:
> On Saturday 2 May 2015 at 3:36:47 AM, in
> , Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>> https://bugs.gnupg.org/gnupg/issue1967
>
> Do you think a notification should be displayed, something like
> "Signing subkey 0x01234567 not available. Creating signature us
