Dear all,
I'd be interested in hearing Werner Koch's take on this recent
innovation. Werner, you speak German:
A new "Everyman's software" featuring certification, key servers,
currently Windows only (Linux planned),
https://www.sit.fraunhofer.de/de/volksverschluesselung/
Said to be Open Source
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 22:52, david.j.woo...@gmail.com said:
> I debugged this issue a few days ago. I've posted a patch for testing and
> hopefully incorporation into a future GnuPG 2.1 build at
It is on my shortlist.
Thanks,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgeset
On 13/01/2014, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 12/01/14 00:18, Sam Kuper wrote:
>> Again, perhaps I am wrong. But if I am not, then the use of OpenPGP
>> cards with non-pinpad readers still makes no sense (at least, not to
>> me).
>
> Since most readers don't filter VERIFY commands
Yes, I'm getting to
Sounds like you should report it directly to GPGTools.org. I'm sure they have
a bug tracker or mailing address somewhere.
Have you seen any technical details on this attack? Its hard to tell exactly
what's happening from that article.
.hc
Eric F:
> Perhaps not directly gnupg related, more OS
Hi,
when using --verify combined with --status-fd [or --status-file], how
can one notice in scripts, that processing the one signature is done and
that further status-fd messages belong to the next message?
I mean, sometimes it shows SIG_ID, but not in case of ERRSIG.
So is there some line / sep
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:39, patrick-mailingli...@whonix.org said:
> when using --verify combined with --status-fd [or --status-file], how
> can one notice in scripts, that processing the one signature is done and
> that further status-fd messages belong to the next message?
That is unfortunately a
On 3/19/15 10:39 AM, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
Hi,
when using --verify combined with --status-fd [or --status-file], how
can one notice in scripts, that processing the one signature is done and
that further status-fd messages belong to the next message?
You are using --with-colons, right?
--
On Thursday 19 March 2015 09:18:03 Thomas F. Ruddy wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'd be interested in hearing Werner Koch's take on this recent
> innovation. Werner, you speak German:
>
> A new "Everyman's software" featuring certification, key servers,
> currently Windows only (Linux planned),
>
> htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 at 1:35:46 AM, in
,
Brian Minton wrote:
> I thought keyservers strip all punctuation. So
> becomes foo example com.
Keyservers seem to do that.
GnuPG locating keys on the local keyring does not.
A user with GnuPG co
On 19/03/15 22:32, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Thursday 19 March 2015 09:18:03 Thomas F. Ruddy wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I'd be interested in hearing Werner Koch's take on this recent
>> innovation. Werner, you speak German:
>>
>> A new "Everyman's software" featuring certification, key servers,
>> cu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 at 6:18:57 PM, in
, Jose Castillo
wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2015, at 8:55 PM, MFPA
> <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> wrote:
MFPA>> No angle brackets around the email address means no key found.
JC> Good point, I’l
11 matches
Mail list logo