On 2015-02-09 09:45, Stephan Beck wrote:
> Hi, Osvaldo,
>
> Am 07.02.2015 um 20:43 schrieb Hugo Osvaldo Barrera:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm trying to edit one of my key's trust, but it keeps showing unknown even
> > after changing it:
> >
> [...]
>
> > $ gpg --list-secret-keys
> > gpg: checking th
On 2015-02-08 09:51, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 07/02/15 20:43, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> > I don't think I'm doing something wrong, but: Am I? Did I miss something?
>
> Yes, you have interpreted it wrong. What you are doing now is this statement:
>
> "I trust Hugo Osvaldo Barrera checks ident
Hi,
I'm trying to get my smartcard to work under Mac OS X (OSX 10.9,
Mavricks) with GnuPG 2.1.1. It mostly works out of the box, but there is
one minor issue that I can't get to work: the pinpad on my SmartCard
reader (SPR332). (Pin is asked by the pinentry program, not by the card
reader itself)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/02/15 10:27, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> However, the issue at hand is another: even if I set a trust of 5
> (ultimate), the next screen still shows it as unknown and that doesn't
> change.
Also not when you quit and edit the key again? It sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/02/15 20:06, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> Does this mean that if someone revokes their key today, *all past*
> signatures become invalid?
I believe so, yes. You should probably have expired it instead, sorry.
Suppose it is revoked because some
On 02/09/2015 07:07 PM, Niobos wrote:
> I've tried to debug this myself. This is what I found:
> I can see scdaemon doing pcsc_vendor_specific_init(), but failing:
>
>> pcsc_vendor_specific_init: GET_FEATURE_REQUEST failed: 65538
It means:
In order to use pinpad input, scdaemon asked PC/SC servic
On 2015-02-09 14:31, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> On 02/09/2015 07:07 PM, Niobos wrote:
>> I've tried to debug this myself. This is what I found:
>> I can see scdaemon doing pcsc_vendor_specific_init(), but failing:
>>
>>> pcsc_vendor_specific_init: GET_FEATURE_REQUEST failed: 65538
>
> It means:
> In or
On 02/09/2015 11:07 PM, Niobos wrote:
> How should I do that? Here is what I've found so far:
>
> % /usr/sbin/pcscd -v
> PCSC Framework version 1.4.0.
> Copyright (C) 1999-2002 by David Corcoran .
> Copyright (C) 2001-2005 by Ludovic Rousseau .
> Copyright (C) 2003-2004 by Damien Sauveron .
> Port
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:54 AM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun
wrote:
> Welcome to my worst nightmare: trying to make GnuPG agent (and for
> that matter the SSH agent) runnable in the foreground. (My purpose
> was to run it under a process supervisor like `runit` or `s6`, but
> regardless...)
>
> Short
On 2015-02-09 15:33, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> On 02/09/2015 11:07 PM, Niobos wrote:
>> How should I do that? Here is what I've found so far:
>>
>> % /usr/sbin/pcscd -v
>> PCSC Framework version 1.4.0.
>> Copyright (C) 1999-2002 by David Corcoran .
>> Copyright (C) 2001-2005 by Ludovic Rousseau .
>> Co
On 2015-02-09 14:28, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 08/02/15 20:06, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> > Does this mean that if someone revokes their key today, *all past*
> > signatures become invalid?
>
> I believe so, yes. You should probably have expired it instead, sorry.
>
> Suppose it is revoked bec
Hi!
Back in October Smári posted an article with the problems he encountered
while integrating GnuPG into mailpile. See
https://www.mailpile.is/blog/2014-10-07_Some_Thoughts_on_GnuPG.html .
I asked him whether I may comment on this over at gnupg-user and with
2.1.0 out of the way I started to dr
On Mon 2015-02-09 12:54:33 -0500, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> Out of curiosity: is the revocation reason even saved? Would it be possible
> for
> gpg to actually use it in future?
Yes, the revocation reason *is* stored in the revocation signature, in
the "reason for revocation" subpacket:
h
On Monday 09 February 2015 20:27:09 Werner Koch wrote:
> Back in October Smári posted an article with the problems he encountered
> while integrating GnuPG into mailpile. See
> https://www.mailpile.is/blog/2014-10-07_Some_Thoughts_on_GnuPG.html .
>
> I asked him whether I may comment on this over
On 02/10/2015 12:25 AM, Niobos wrote:
> I have searched my system for reader.h, but didn't find that file. Next,
> I grepped through the better part of my filesystem (/usr, /System,
> /Library) for GET_FEATURE_REQUEST, and also came up empty.
>
> I have found a website [1] which might mean more to
15 matches
Mail list logo
