On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:59, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
> If GnuPG encounters this situation, but file.ext.sig is not a detached
> signature, it could display a big fat warning:
>
> WARNING: file.ext.sig is NOT a detached signature; the file file.ext is
> NOT VERIFIED!
I think this is what I wil
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:53, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
> In file included from /usr/include/netinet/in.h:22:
> In file included from ../gl/stdint.h:83:
That file is the cause of a lot of evil. gnulib is simply to complex to
use only a small part of it and neglect to update it with each release.
N
Hi,
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 15:22, mailing-li...@asatiifm.net said:
>> gcc -I/usr/local/Cellar/libgcrypt/1.6.2/include
! >> -I/usr/local/Cellar/libgpg-error/1.13/include
>> -I/usr/local/Cellar/libassuan/2.1.2/include
! >> -I/usr/local/Cellar/libgpg-error/1.13/include
>> -I/usr/local/Cellar/libk
On 11/11/14 09:52, Werner Koch wrote:
> I think this is what I will implement.
How would the warning be triggered? By the extension of the signature
file or by existence of a file without the .sig extension, or even some
other way?
> That is an entire different thing and not a problem of gpg.
If
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:00, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
> How would the warning be triggered? By the extension of the signature
> file or by existence of a file without the .sig extension, or even some
> other way?
Using an extension is in general not a good idea but in this case we use
it anywa
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:52, nicholas.c...@gmail.com said:
>
>> How does unattended generation of elliptic curve keys work? As far as
>> I can see, that section of the manual has not been updated for the new
>> EC options, but I presume that it h
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:56, nicholas.c...@gmail.com said:
> Is that still possible? In version 2.1, if no password is specified,
> gpg2 tries to call pin-entry and ask for a passphrase.
A quick look into the manual (for me the source, but you may want to use
the online version) gives:
@item %n
I'm so sorry, Werner. I thought I'd checked the manual. Huge apologies.
On Tuesday, 11 November 2014, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:56, nicholas.c...@gmail.com said:
>
> > Is that still possible? In version 2.1, if no password is specified,
> > gpg2 tries to call pin-entry and as
In https://www.mailpile.is/blog/2014-10-07_Some_Thoughts_on_GnuPG.html
the Mailpile developers would like to replace GnuPG with something better
and for the short term propose to extend GnuPG with a command line JSON
interface in the short term.
I've commented the article under the LWN news about
Hi,
That’s somehow just the result of running ./configure. Running a fresh (fresh
untarred source, no speedo runs) configure reported this for me:
…
configure: checking for libraries
checking for gpg-error-config... /usr/local/bin/gpg-error-config
checking for GPG Error - version >= 1.15... yes
Does anyone have gpg-agent forwarding working with SSH's recent generic socket
forwarding? Does it still require socat on one end, because I've only been able
to specify a socket path on the left-hand side of the forwarding specification.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all,
I'm merging one of my 'old' sub-key into another key-pair.
It kept the same keygrip but got a new ID/fingerprint.
How can I use that new subkey to decrypt something encrypted to my 'old'
subkey ?
Regards
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-use
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:59, mailing-li...@asatiifm.net said:
> I don’t have CFLAGS set to anything. Mac OS X 10.9 and using homebrew
> for most things. The only thing I do is run ./configure && make in the
> untarred gnupg-2.1.0. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s something
I don't know any detail
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:21, bernh...@intevation.de said:
> In https://www.mailpile.is/blog/2014-10-07_Some_Thoughts_on_GnuPG.html
> the Mailpile developers would like to replace GnuPG with something better
> and for the short term propose to extend GnuPG with a command line JSON
I have a reply in
No worries on my part.
> it seems to install software in versioned directories.
Exactly, under /usr/local… and without messing with the system installed
binaries or libraries. Some things, like openssl libraries, it will not link
automatically to avoid some issues with system provided libraries
"Gnupg-users"
wrote on 11/08/2014 12:54:30 PM:
> - Message from Werner Koch on Fri, 07 Nov 2014
> 17:32:49 +0100 -
>
> To:
>
> "Robert J. Hansen"
>
> cc:
>
> gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>
> Subject:
>
> Re: GPG 2.1.0/Win32: keyserver lookup problems
>
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 20:09, r...
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 09:21:14PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> I am looking for one or two people who would like to fill the @gnupg
> Twitter account with some life.
>
> I am not one of those short message people but Twitter seems to be a big
> deal these days. Thus if someone would be interested
Hello,
One of the changes introduced with GnuPG 2.1 -- namely, using dirmngr
for key retrieval -- has caused some problems for me. First of all, I'm
not able to use gpg --refresh-keys anymore, as dirmngr requests all of
the keys from the keyserver at once, instead of one-by-one as GnuPG 2.0
did.
18 matches
Mail list logo
