GPG encrypted data (using RSA) can be collected today and easily decrypted
after 50-100 years using a quantum computer. See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm
For this reason, what I do today is share long keys with people I know *in
person*. We then use regular AES-256 to encrypt/d
What are your thoughts on these issues? Why do you keep using GPG, knowing
that your data may easily end up out in the open on Google or The Pirate
Bay a few decades from now?
Bluntly, my thoughts are that 99% of the people who talk about quantum
computation couldn't identify a Hadamard transf
Hi freaks,
Hi Werner,
I was now looking at the results of the last goteo-campain and I am a
little bit shocked about the costs for such a campaign.
I am shure, that everybody did his best and for better understanding
would like to submit some questions:
- there ist a position of:
Ca
Goteo fee 2939,-- €
Goteo charges an amount proportional to the funds that are raised.
2939 euros on 37270 is about an eight percent overhead. Seems
reasonable to me.
My question now: Would'nt it be better to put every year some
"Index" in the top of the gnupg-website with the ac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Tuesday 13 May 2014 at 5:03:03 PM, in
,
David Q. wrote:
> GPG encrypted data (using RSA) can be collected today
> and easily decrypted after 50-100 years using a quantum
> computer.
I'm not likely to be alive by then.
> Why do you keep
I don't know if this is a bug, or if I am doing something wrong, so I might as
well ask here. I ran the following command from my terminal, and cannot
retrieve the fingerprint from the file:
$ gpg --output 0xBB065B251FF4945B.gpg --export 0xBB065B251FF4945B
$ gpg --with-colons --with-finger
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 05:15:57PM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> I don't know if this is a bug, or if I am doing something wrong, so I might as
> well ask here. I ran the following command from my terminal, and cannot
> retrieve the fingerprint from the file:
>
> $ gpg --output 0xBB065B251FF49
On May 13, 2014, at 7:15 PM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> I don't know if this is a bug, or if I am doing something wrong, so I might as
> well ask here. I ran the following command from my terminal, and cannot
> retrieve the fingerprint from the file:
>
>$ gpg --output 0xBB065B251FF4945B.gpg --ex
